Countless young people across America are fervent proponents of ranked choice voting (RCV), also known as instant runoff voting, and incorrectly accept that it could cure many of our electoral ills – from reducing the impact of minority rule to broadening the diversity of political candidates. I was one of those people.
Now I realize just how wrong I was.
In college, I was happy to spew all sorts of RCV propaganda. I falsely believed that RCV would eliminate minority rule, the spoiler effect, the wasted vote phenomenon, and more! The benefits appeared clear as day. However, as I naïvely advocated for RCV across my state, I encountered many people who did not share my views. After listening to their arguments and doing more research, several alarming examples and facts quickly crushed my utopian view of an RCV society.
Indeed, my opinion of RCV has completely changed. I no longer support the system for three key reasons.
First of all, although RCV seems deceptively simple at first glance, a deeper look reveals a level of complexity that isn't just theoretical – it's real, and it affects voters at the booth. The ballot process, which requires voters to rank candidates in order of preference rather than simply checking a box, is perplexing.
This brings to light an incredibly important question that supporters of RCV often forget: how does this affect our vulnerable voters? The elderly, people with disabilities, the less educated, and the non-native English-speakers? For these vulnerable voters, the complexity of RCV increases the likelihood of errors. In navigating the new system, they are more likely to misunderstand the ranking process, ultimately leading to their ballot being filled out incorrectly. And what happens to incorrectly filled ballots? It's a dreadfully easy answer: they are thrown away.
Because of this, RCV actually decreases the representation and electoral influence of minority voters as such voters disproportionately “exhaust” their ballots – a meek term for getting their ballots thrown out. For example, a study of the 2011 San Francisco mayoral election found that Asian-American and Latino voters had higher rates of incorrectly filled ballots compared to other demographic groups, meaning those specific minority groups had their voices disregarded. An effective voting system would ensure that this does not happen because American elections should be accessible for every lawful voter and ensure that every vote counts.
The complexity of RCV also slows down the entire electoral process, increasing both the lines at the polling places and the time it takes to count ballots.
Secondly, RCV disenfranchises voters. What misguided supporters of RCV often fail to recognize is that votes cast for lower-ranking candidates can become irrelevant if those candidates are dropped from the tally. In practical terms, this has led to significant numbers of “exhausted ballots.”
For instance, in New York City's 2021 council race, a staggering 15% of votes were discarded due to ballot exhaustion. In the same year, a mayoral race in Sandy, Utah was decided by only 21 votes, where more than 18% of the original ballots (over 4,000 total) were discarded. According to a study of four local elections in California, between 9.6% and 27.1% of ballots were exhausted before the final round.
This effectively undermines the notion of every vote counting equally. In a traditional plurality voting system, a voter's ballot is still counted in the overall tally, preserving its impact on the final outcome even if a voter's chosen candidate loses. In contrast, RCV swiftly and effectively diminishes voter influence through discarding ballots.
This is hardly the mark of a more democratic system.
Finally, RCV can also lead to surprising election results that don't necessarily reflect the majority's will.
In the Alaska special congressional race of 2022, for example, a Democrat won in the final runoff phase of an RCV election despite the fact that GOP candidates garnered 60% of the votes in the initial round. This outcome has sparked concerns that RCV actually distorts voter intent more than clarifies it.
Maine has also served time as an RCV testing ground, and the muddled results there have been eye-opening. In the 2018 election for Maine's 2nd Congressional District, incumbent Bruce Poliquin led in the initial round with a plurality of the votes. However, as votes from eliminated candidates were redistributed in subsequent rounds, Jared Golden won the election in the final round. Once again, RCV fails to promise a valid outcome.
Passionate but misguided proponents of RCV, like me in college, would incorrectly argue that the solution to these issues lies in better voter education and outreach. This is undoubtedly important, but it does not fully address the system's inherent flaws.
Our constitutional republic should empower, not dilute, the voice of the people. Because of this, RCV will never be practical or effective.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: CNN's Disgusting Spin on Israeli Strike Leaves Viewers Fuming
The Many Failures Of Ranked Choice Voting
Corporate Media Tries To Hide Kamala Harris’s Staff Turnover
Ahead of the election, legacy media appears to be rewriting history in an attempt to keep Kamala Harris in the White House.
Kamala Harris's offices have been notorious for pitiful retention rates, and journalists that have previously acknowledged that as an indicator of her questionable leadership seem to be walking back their former positions in an attempt to thwart Trump from reclaiming the presidency.
Breitbart News reports:
“A Kamala Harris staff exodus reignites questions about her leadership style — and her future ambitions,” Washington Post reporters.
Former British Prime Minister Demands Global Social Media Restrictions
Vulnerable Senator’s Election Campaign Accused Of Benefitting From Fraudulent Donations
Federal Judge Dismisses Machine Gun Charges Against Kansas Man
Brian Stelter Announces Return To CNN
Countless young people across America are fervent proponents of ranked choice voting (RCV), also known as instant runoff voting, and incorrectly accept that it could cure many of our electoral ills – from reducing the impact of minority rule to broadening the diversity of political candidates. I was one of those people.
Now I realize just how wrong I was.
In college, I was happy to spew all sorts of RCV propaganda. I falsely believed that RCV would eliminate minority rule, the spoiler effect, the wasted vote phenomenon, and more! The benefits appeared clear as day. However, as I naïvely advocated for RCV across my state, I encountered many people who did not share my views. After listening to their arguments and doing more research, several alarming examples and facts quickly crushed my utopian view of an RCV society.
Indeed, my opinion of RCV has completely changed. I no longer support the system for three key reasons.
First of all, although RCV seems deceptively simple at first glance, a deeper look reveals a level of complexity that isn't just theoretical – it's real, and it affects voters at the booth. The ballot process, which requires voters to rank candidates in order of preference rather than simply checking a box, is perplexing.
This brings to light an incredibly important question that supporters of RCV often forget: how does this affect our vulnerable voters? The elderly, people with disabilities, the less educated, and the non-native English-speakers? For these vulnerable voters, the complexity of RCV increases the likelihood of errors. In navigating the new system, they are more likely to misunderstand the ranking process, ultimately leading to their ballot being filled out incorrectly. And what happens to incorrectly filled ballots? It's a dreadfully easy answer: they are thrown away.
Because of this, RCV actually decreases the representation and electoral influence of minority voters as such voters disproportionately “exhaust” their ballots – a meek term for getting their ballots thrown out. For example, a study of the 2011 San Francisco mayoral election found that Asian-American and Latino voters had higher rates of incorrectly filled ballots compared to other demographic groups, meaning those specific minority groups had their voices disregarded. An effective voting system would ensure that this does not happen because American elections should be accessible for every lawful voter and ensure that every vote counts.
The complexity of RCV also slows down the entire electoral process, increasing both the lines at the polling places and the time it takes to count ballots.
Secondly, RCV disenfranchises voters. What misguided supporters of RCV often fail to recognize is that votes cast for lower-ranking candidates can become irrelevant if those candidates are dropped from the tally. In practical terms, this has led to significant numbers of “exhausted ballots.”
For instance, in New York City's 2021 council race, a staggering 15% of votes were discarded due to ballot exhaustion. In the same year, a mayoral race in Sandy, Utah was decided by only 21 votes, where more than 18% of the original ballots (over 4,000 total) were discarded. According to a study of four local elections in California, between 9.6% and 27.1% of ballots were exhausted before the final round.
This effectively undermines the notion of every vote counting equally. In a traditional plurality voting system, a voter's ballot is still counted in the overall tally, preserving its impact on the final outcome even if a voter's chosen candidate loses. In contrast, RCV swiftly and effectively diminishes voter influence through discarding ballots.
This is hardly the mark of a more democratic system.
Finally, RCV can also lead to surprising election results that don't necessarily reflect the majority's will.
In the Alaska special congressional race of 2022, for example, a Democrat won in the final runoff phase of an RCV election despite the fact that GOP candidates garnered 60% of the votes in the initial round. This outcome has sparked concerns that RCV actually distorts voter intent more than clarifies it.
Maine has also served time as an RCV testing ground, and the muddled results there have been eye-opening. In the 2018 election for Maine's 2nd Congressional District, incumbent Bruce Poliquin led in the initial round with a plurality of the votes. However, as votes from eliminated candidates were redistributed in subsequent rounds, Jared Golden won the election in the final round. Once again, RCV fails to promise a valid outcome.
Passionate but misguided proponents of RCV, like me in college, would incorrectly argue that the solution to these issues lies in better voter education and outreach. This is undoubtedly important, but it does not fully address the system's inherent flaws.
Our constitutional republic should empower, not dilute, the voice of the people. Because of this, RCV will never be practical or effective.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: CNN's Disgusting Spin on Israeli Strike Leaves Viewers Fuming
Emmaline Merrill
Corporate Media Tries To Hide Kamala Harris’s Staff Turnover
Search
follow us
subscribe
Trending Stories
ABC News Releases Rules For Trump-Harris Debate
ABC News released the rules that both RepublicanTim Walz Called ‘Coward,’ Military ‘Impersonator’ By Fellow Soldiers
ANALYSIS – Dishonorable veteran. I have been hittingWill China Retake Its Lost Lands In Russia’s Siberia?
ANALYSIS – It could happen. "May we liveDangerous Obsession: Secret Service Records Reveal DEI Is Top Priority For All Agency Employees In ‘Every Action, Every Day’
Despite being tasked with the critically-important task ofCommentary
Gun Controlling Brazil’s Ban On X And Free Speech Not Only Predictable But Inevitable
Biden Administration Uses ‘KKK Act’ To Charge Christians Protesting At Abortion Clinics
WEF Makes Another Move To Force Us Into Submission
Criminal Biden Speaks Out – His Latest Statement Will Make You Sick
Security
Report: Texas Oil Company Warns Employees Of Migrant Gangs As Attacks Surge
What Will US Military Leaders Do In An Election Crisis?
US Marines Join South Koreans In Major Amphibious Drill
Report: Justice Department Accuses Russia Of Election Interference, Announces Indictments
Foreign Affairs
Former British Prime Minister Demands Global Social Media Restrictions
Scotland’s New Hate Speech Law Raises Concerns Over Free Expression
Gun Controlling Brazil’s Ban On X And Free Speech Not Only Predictable But Inevitable
Blaze Media Fires Lauren Chen Over Allegations Of Taking Kremlin Cash
Business & economics
Biden Admits Inflation Reduction Act Was Deceptively Named
Services And Manufacturing Industries Facing Severe Challenges – What’s Behind The Numbers?
August Private Payrolls Rise By Just 99,000, Marking Smallest Gain Since 2021
Gas Prices Drop Sharply – The Canary In The Coal Mine For An Impending Economic Crisis
heath & science
James Darren, Known For ‘Gidget’ And ‘TJ Hooker,’ Dies At Age 88
Governor Youngkin’s ‘It Only Takes One’ Campaign Aims To Tackle Fentanyl Crisis
Zuckerberg Admits Regret Over Facebook’s COVID Collusion – See The Details
Vance: Trump Would Veto Any Federal Abortion Ban
American Liberty Arms
Knives Out: After Virtually Outlawing Guns, UK Officials Now Coming After Knives
Massachusetts Court Strikes Down Switch-Blade Ban, Citing Bruen
Former Rep. Gabbard On ‘No Fly List’ Should Concern All Gun Owners
California Gun Control Fails To Prevent 49ers Player From Being Shot, Nearly Killed
At American Liberty News, we eschew the mainstream media’s tightly controlled narrative to provide our readers with real news, real insights, and the means to take action. We seek out insightful coverage – and partner with knowledgeable and experienced people and organizations to bring you the information and insight our readers demand.
We humbly seek to provide the tools and information necessary for our readers to decide for themselves what is true and what is right.
TOP TAGS
TOP CATEGORIES
FEATURES
American Liberty News ©2022
Evolution Digital Media | 1900 Reston Metro Plz | Suite 600 | Reston, VA 20190