Senior officials in President Donald Trump’s administration are reportedly growing increasingly concerned that journalists Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan may have obtained unauthorized access to highly sensitive discussions in the White House Situation Room.
The concern stems from excerpts released ahead of the June 23 publication of “Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump,” a new book by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan. The passages contain detailed accounts of internal administration deliberations, including conversations involving military planning, national security decisions, and politically sensitive matters.
According to Axios, some administration officials fear the level of detail suggests that recordings may have been made of meetings held inside one of the most secure facilities in the federal government. (RELATED: Judge Slams Brakes On Trump’s Fortified White House Ballroom After Stunning Military Reveal)
Questions over Situation Room discussions
The Situation Room is among the most tightly controlled spaces in Washington.
Presidents, Cabinet officials, military leaders, intelligence chiefs, and senior advisers routinely use the facility to discuss classified operations, diplomatic negotiations, and national security threats. Independent recording devices are prohibited.
If conversations were secretly recorded or removed from the facility, officials believe it would represent a significant security breach.
“We’re afraid some of our most sensitive conversations were being recorded,” one administration source told Axios. “And we have no idea which ones.”
At this point, there is no public evidence that recordings exist.
Haberman and Swan have declined to discuss how they obtained the information included in the book.
Book details internal debates
The book is based on more than 1,000 interviews and examines major decisions during Trump’s second term.
Among the excerpts drawing attention is an account of a February 2025 Situation Room meeting involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and discussions about possible military action against Iran.
According to the book, Netanyahu presented several potential strike scenarios, including options tied to regime change inside Iran.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio reportedly dismissed portions of the proposal, saying, “In other words, it’s bullshit.”
The book also portrays Vice President JD Vance as skeptical of deeper American involvement in another Middle Eastern conflict, highlighting internal disagreements over U.S. policy toward Israel and Iran.
Epstein discussions also revealed
Other passages reportedly describe internal White House discussions concerning records connected to Jeffrey Epstein.
According to the accounts, several meetings involved Vance and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles as administration officials debated how to respond to public pressure surrounding the documents.
Trump was not present for every discussion, according to the reporting, but expressed frustration whenever aides raised the issue and wanted the controversy put behind him.
One proposal described in the book involved asking Tucker Carlson to interview Ghislaine Maxwell in prison in hopes she would publicly state that Trump had no involvement in Epstein’s criminal conduct. (RELATED: Trump Reportedly Lashed Out At Charlie Kirk Over Epstein Focus, New Book Claims)
Leaks revive old tensions
The disclosures have reignited longstanding tensions between Trump’s team and two reporters who have chronicled his political career for years.
Haberman and Swan have extensively covered Trump’s rise, first presidency, departure from office, and return to power.
White House officials have not publicly challenged the accuracy of the quoted conversations. Instead, much of the frustration appears centered on how the information was obtained.
Some administration officials reportedly fear the episode reflects a broader problem that has persisted across both Trump administrations: individuals inside government leaking sensitive information to the press.
The controversy has also renewed complaints among some Trump allies that certain bureaucrats and military officials continue to resist the administration’s agenda in ways they argue would not be tolerated under other presidents.
Recordings remain unconfirmed
Despite speculation inside the White House, there is another explanation.
Veteran Washington reporters frequently reconstruct meetings using extensive interviews with participants, aides, and officials familiar with events. Haberman and Swan’s reported pool of more than 1,000 interviews could provide enough sourcing to recreate conversations in substantial detail without relying on recordings.
That possibility has done little to calm concerns inside the administration.
Whether the scenes were reconstructed through interviews or obtained through another method, the excerpts have already generated intense interest ahead of the book’s release.
For the White House, the larger issue extends beyond a single publication. The episode underscores how difficult it remains to keep internal deliberations private, even inside the most secure rooms in government.
As administration officials continue searching for answers, one question remains unresolved: how did conversations intended to stay behind closed doors end up in a bestselling political book?
READ NEXT: Trump Ally-Turned-Critic Warns Of Incoming GOP Bloodbath
