ANALYSIS – It's not looking good for the “bonnie” Prince Andrew in 2024. His days as a prince living the high life at the 31-room Royal Lodge in Windsor may be coming to an ignominious end.
This, due to the latest allegations released in U.S. court papers naming associates of the multi-millionaire serial sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The 63-year-old Andrew is mentioned 69 times (no puns please) in the court papers. And none in a good way.
The latest sordid allegations have plunged the Royal Family into a fresh scandal with claims Andrew took part in an “underage orgy” and groped a woman's breast while she sat in his lap.
An underage girl was also reportedly told by Epstein to give Andrew “whatever he demanded” while on Epstein's private Caribbean resort dubbed “pedophile island.”
In the court papers, “Jane Doe 3” – believed to be Virginia Giuffre, now 40, was repeatedly forced to have sex with Andrew.
The files read: “For instance, one such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 [then 17] to have sexual relations with was a member of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew (aka Duke of York).”
“Jane Doe #3 was forced to have sexual relations with this prince when she was a minor in three separate geographical locations: in London (at Ghislaine Maxwell's apartment), in New York, and on Epstein's private island in the US Virgin Islands (in an orgy with numerous other under-aged girls).”
The Duke of York had been stripped of his royal roles and banished from public duty by Queen Elizabeth two years ago as he paid out millions of pounds to alleged sex abuse victim Giuffre.
But Andrew – who has always maintained his innocence – has “crept” back into royal life. He recently appeared with the rest of the Royal Family, including ex-wife Fergie, on a Christmas Day walk to church in a surprising show of unity.
The latest claims, however, and their incriminating details, have led to calls for the King to force his brother from the Royal Lodge in Windsor and even remove his royal title.
This would require a total break with Andrew.
The Sun reported:
Royal commentator and author Phil Dampier said: “This is the final nail in the coffin. If Andrew harboured any thoughts he might eventually come back this has destroyed these hopes.”
Writing in The Sun, Charles biographer and royal expert Robert Jobson says: “The King would be wise to cut ties completely with his brother.
“Andrew is a liability and this scandal is not going way.”
Norman Baker, former Lib Dem Home Office minister, said: “This needs to be resolved once and for all and this boil needs to be lanced.”
Meanwhile, adding pressure to the Royal Family, an activist group has said the new information about Andrew raises “serious questions” it wants answers, so the royals stop appearing to be “beyond the law.”
The Mirror reported:
The documents – part of a case against Epstein's girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell – have thrust Andrew back into the spotlight. They do not reveal any major new allegations about Epstein or his associates.
Graham Smith, Republic's CEO, stated: “I have reported Andrew to the police, well aware that the Met claims to have looked into this before. To date there appears to have been no serious criminal investigation, no interview of the accused or other witnesses and no clear justification for taking no action.
“I am calling on the Met police to re-open this case, I am calling on MPs to debate this affair in parliament, and I am calling on Charles to make a public statement – in front of the press and taking questions – to respond to these allegations and what they say about the monarchy.”
In response, a Met Police spokeswoman said: “We are aware of the release of court documents in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. As with any matter, should new and relevant information be brought to our attention we will assess it. No investigation has been launched.”
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: New York Attorney General Demands Trump Fork Over $370 Million In Fraud Case
