Sponsored
Send a HeroBox Care Package Today!ANALYSIS – Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly called for heavy weapons such as tanks and artillery, but especially multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS). However, most nations are sending infantry weapons or anti-tank weapons instead. (RELATED: Retired Russian Colonel Admits War Not Going Well for Russia on State TV – Then Backtracks)
Specifically, reports The Washington Post:
Ukraine says it needs 60 multiple-launch rocket systems to have a chance at defeating Russia, suggesting the number pledged by the West so far may be inadequate, along with access to sophisticated air defenses to help protect vulnerable citizens from relentless shelling.
Oleksiy Arestovych, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, told the Guardian that 60 launchers would stop Russian forces “dead in their tracks.” Forty would slow them down with heavy casualties, he said, while 20 would increase Russian casualties but leave the battlefield outcome little changed.
Many Western leaders have pledged to “stand with Ukraine” and announced a significant military and humanitarian aid plan. According to the Ukraine support tracker based at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, there has been $64.56 billion in government-to-government commitments to Ukraine.
This includes $19 billion in financial aid and $13 billion in humanitarian assistance. However, the most significant contribution of $34 billion is for military aid to Ukraine.
The U.S. is the largest supporter of Ukraine, having committed $25 billion in military aid. The UK, Poland and EU follow with $3 billion, $2 billion and $2 billion, respectively. (RELATED: Assessing Russia’s ‘Growing’ Tactical Strength in Ukraine)
Among heavy weapon deliveries, Poland has supplied 240 Soviet-era T-72 battle tanks. The U.S. has delivered more than 200 armored personnel carriers and other vehicles and 90 M777 howitzers.
Norway has supplied 100 Mistral man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS). In contrast, the U.S has delivered 800 Stinger missiles, with 500 from Germany, 200 from the Netherlands and 160 from the Czech Republic.
Chancellor Olaf Scholz has now announced that Germany will double its arms aid to Ukraine, which already stands at $2bn. Scholz was recently openly criticized for his hesitant attitude in supplying heavy weapons.
Germany’s Bild newspaper reports what Germany fears most in aiding Ukraine, according to Yahoo News:
“Sources close to the government say there is concern that Ukraine could become overconfident if it experiences a string of battlefield victories and rolls into Russian territory – which would mean that German tanks would once again be inside Russia,” reads the report.
Meanwhile, adds The Washington Post:
The United States and Britain recently announced plans to provide Kyiv with multiple-launch rocket systems (MLRS), which can hit targets up to 50 miles away. Washington is dispatching four M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, known as HIMARS, though Ukrainian troops need at least three weeks of training to use them, the Pentagon said. Britain has confirmed it would send an unspecified number of M270 launch systems to Ukraine.
NATO countries need to do more. Naked aggression against any western country must be defeated or the message to others thinking about it, such as communist China, will be horrible.
READ NEXT: Leaked? Audio of Top Secret Chinese Meeting for Invading Taiwan >>
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
Sponsored
Send a HeroBox Care Package Today!
Paul Crespo is the Managing Editor of American Liberty Defense News. As a Marine Corps officer, he led Marines, served aboard ships in the Pacific and jumped from helicopters and airplanes. He was also a military attaché with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) at U.S. embassies worldwide. He later ran for state and federal office, taught political science, wrote for the editorial board of a major newspaper and had his own radio show. A graduate of Georgetown, London and Cambridge universities, he brings decades of experience and insight to the issues that most threaten our American liberty – at home and from abroad. To read more go to: paulcrespo.com.
There are only two ways this war ends… Ukraine loses a devastating war of attrition OR Putin (or someone else in Moscow) decides the cost of “victory” is too high for Russia. We should do everything possible short of sending nukes to ensure it’s the latter.
You mean that America should declare war on Russia? Should America put boots on the ground in one of the most corrupt countries in Europe? What about the 46 Biolabs in the Ukraine? Should we stop ignoring them or take them out?
The U$A will fight this Obama/CIA in$tigated proxy war weakly, a$ long as po$$ible to the last drop of Ukrainian blood.
MIC!, MIC!, MIC!, MIC!, MIC!, MIC!, MIC!
Russia is showing the whole world their weaknesses, Take notes.
Who cares? What does that have to do with us?
That fine, JUST LEAVE US OUT OF IT!!!
I disagree, NATO needs to honour the North Atlantic Treaty of 1949 and get out of Ukraine.
The United States has no business sending weapons to Ukraine while we have rampant inflation, and supply line issues here at home.
Australia too!
Do so Now NATO or will U send troops in to mix?
Ukraine wants Intel, Logistics, Arms, ammo, medical aid & foods