Congress Investigating Massive Union Boss Scheme To Use Billions In Pension Funds To Push Corporate Socialism

A congressional watchdog is demanding the nation’s top union bosses turn over documents on their efforts to use billions of dollars held in union members’ pensions to push left-wing corporate activism.

Such a scheme would not only provide left-wing activists with billions of dollars to push a leftist agenda down Americans’ throats, some allege it may violate federal law regarding the management of retirement funds.

U.S. Education and the Workforce Committee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) “sent letters to International Brotherhood of Teamsters President Sean O’Brien, AFL-CIO President Elizabeth Shuler, and Service Employees International Union President Mary Kay Henry demanding answers regarding their respective unions’ attempts to leverage pension plan holdings to engage in shareholder proxy voting activism,” the Committee has announced in a statement. (RELATED: Did This Biden Official Lie To Congress About A Half-Trillion-Dollar Mistake?)

“In recent years, unions have engaged in significant shareholder proxy voting activities by leveraging their significant pension plan holdings,” Foxx writes. “In light of recent high-profile proxy votes pushed by unions, the Committee on Education and the Workforce (Committee) is investigating shareholder activism activities that involve assets held by union pension plans, the impact on the value of the pension plan investments, and the expenses incurred by the plans in pursuit of these activities. As part of this investigation, the Committee is making this inquiry to understand the practice of proxy voting by your union.” (RELATED: Leftist Teachers Union Official Targets Rich Jews For ‘Class War’)

Such a liberal scheme may be unlawful.

“The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) provides that a fiduciary, such as one who manages the assets of a pension plan, shall discharge his or her duties ‘for the exclusive purpose of (i) providing benefits to participants and their beneficiaries, and (ii) defraying reasonable expenses of administering the plan,’” Foxx continues. “Given that some shareholder activism may not increase investment returns and may impose expenses on a plan, the Committee is seeking to understand these practices.”

Foxx demands the union bosses turn over information on their activist shareholder schemes, and provide answers to questions such as:

Explain how your union engages in shareholder activism or other activities related to proxy voting or influencing shareholder meetings.

How many of the shareholder resolutions filed or supported by your union have received majority support at shareholder meetings?

How many staff members are engaged in activities related to shareholder activism, proxy voting, or other activities related to shareholder meetings?

Does your union have mechanisms in place to determine how much money is expended on its shareholder activism, proxy voting, or other activities to influence shareholder meetings? If so, please provide that figure.

Does your union have any mechanisms in place to calculate the financial benefits of its shareholder activism, proxy voting, or other activities to influence shareholder meetings? If so, please provide the results of that analysis.

What groups does your union partner with when engaging in shareholder activism, proxy voting, or other activities to influence shareholder meetings?

Has your union targeted shareholder proposals at companies it is attempting to organize?

Has your union used shareholder meetings as a means of encouraging companies to sign statements of neutrality or willingness to accept card check organizing?

When your union uses stock held as a union pension plan asset to engage in proxy voting, does your union consider the potential impact a proxy vote can have on financial health of the union’s pension plan? If so, please explain how.

What expenses has your union incurred in its shareholder activism activities? What is the source of funds for these expenses? Have pension plan assets been used to fund any of these expenses?

READ NEXT: Delivery Worker Jumps Out Of Car, Opens Fire On Police