Gun and Gadgets is reporting that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) has issued changes to a rule pertaining to frames and receivers, just two days before the rule is scheduled to go into effect.
Jared Yanis of Guns and Gadgets called the new rule that was supposed to go into effect “cloudy at best.”
Gun Owners of America has since filed a lawsuit against the ATF over the rule change.
The suit was filed in the District of North Dakota and the plaintiff is Morehouse Enterprises LLC, d/b/a Bridge City Ordnance vs the ATF. Bridge City Ordnance is a gun shop in Valley City, North Dakota.
The suit – filed yesterday – states the following:
“In a Notice published in the Federal Register, with a publication date of today, Monday, August 22, 2022 Defendant ATF has noticed changes to the challenged Final Rule entitled “Definition of ‘Frame or Receiver' and Identification of Firearms.” The Final Rule was originally published on April 26, 2022 with an effective date of this Wednesday, August 24, 2022 and the noticed changes also have an effective date of August 24, 2022. Plaintiffs' challenge to that rule has been in litigation before this court since the filling of their complaint on July 5, 2022.
The changes to the Final Rule are described as “corrections,” yet the summary of the changes admits that the complexity of this rulemaking process has even caused the ATF to make numerous mistakes. ATF admits the Final Rule contained inconsistencies, and creates various sources of confusion, which the agency hopes to have identified and fixed”
This story is developing. Stay with American Liberty Arms for the latest updates.
(H/T Guns and Gadgets)
Just like the IRS, FBI & the DOJ in general, the ATF is not friends of America or American citizens.
The four of them have been compromised by the CCP and the DNC.
Totally politicized, totally weaponized…against us.
“Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a two-edged sword [or today’s equivalent] in their hand … this honor have all his saints. Praise ye Yah.” (Psalm 149:6-9)
“But if any provide not for his own, and especially for those of his own house [beginning with spiritual and physical protection], he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” (1 Timothy 5:8)
Which is more potent: 1) An optional right, or 2) A non-optional responsibility?
Which is more likely to be infringed, licensed, and ultimately abolished altogether?
Which did the pre-Second Amendment Americans look to for their authority to bear arms, with little or nor infringement?
Listen to a radio interview Larry Pratt (Executive Director of Gun Owners of America) conducted with me relative to these three questions. I think you’ll find Mr. Pratt’s remarks especially interesting. Go to Bible versus Constitution dot org. Then to our Audio Messages page and scroll down to T 952.
For more, listen to “The Second Amendment: A Knife in a Gunfight,” delivered at the Springfield, Missouri Firearms and Freedom Symposium. Scroll down T 959.
See also online Chapter 12 “Amendment 2: Constitutional vs. Biblical Self-Defense” of “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective.” Click on the top entry on our Online Book page and scroll down to Chapter 12.
Dude, this is a real world problem requiring real world solutions. Keep your mythology out of it.
Throw ALL of the new rules and changes our of court and in to total nullification. Nothing bu5 political nonsense anyway. Ridiculous.
No surprise the ATF acts to circumvent federal requirements. I’ve paid attention to the ATF for decades. The most striking thing about their culture is they are arrogant and careless. I’ve noticed that many of their agents are failed FBI and US Marshal wannabes. Once in the ATF they try to make up for lack of skill, maturity, etc, by being arrogant.
People forget that the federal agents initially shot at WACO were ATF.
Sequence of events: A reporter waiting on a road near the compound let a mail carrier know the raid was to take place that morning.
The carrier (friend of David Koresh) called him and let him know.
A Federal informant inside the compound risked his life and made a cell phone call, telling the feds that they had lost the element of surprise.
ATF leaders told their people:”Hey! They know we’re coming! We’ve got to go in now!”
In 24 years in the Army, I did several operations overseas. If you think the target is alerted – you wait 12-80 hours, then go. Their adrenaline surge has been expended and they are probably exhausted.
You don’t throw your people in to just prove you’re tough.
System would not let me edit the post. It should read you wait 12-16 hours. Not 12-80.