The Federal Bureau of Investigation opened the safe deposit boxes of law-abiding citizens who had not been accused of any crime, made copies of personal records and kept personal property and cash, a federal lawsuit alleges.
Now, the FBI and Justice Department of Justice are asking the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to quietly send a class action lawsuit brought by box owners back down to a lower court without ruling on whether the raid and seizures violated the U.S. Constitution.
“The government's actions are shameless, and we hope the court will see through this attempt to sweep a massive constitutional violation under the rug,” said Rob Johnson, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice, which brought the lawsuit.
“In March 2021, the FBI raided US Private Vaults, a Beverly Hills safe deposit box company. Even though the warrant authorizing the raid only permitted the FBI to open boxes to identify their owners and safeguard the contents, agents opened hundreds of boxes, ran currency they found in front of drug sniffing dogs, and made copies of peoples' most personal records,” the IJ reports.
The scheme was part of a plan by the FBI to loot property from safe deposit boxes, without so much as even alleging a crime.
“It later came out that, months before applying for the warrant, the government had already decided to try to permanently keep everything worth more than $5,000 from the boxes, all without charging any box renter with a crime,” the IJ reports.
“Why $5,000? Because $5,000 is the FBI's minimum monetary threshold for forfeitures. In other words, the government testified that it planned to seize and administratively forfeit every box renter's property so long as it thought it would make money on the deal. It planned this despite not knowing who those renters were, what was in their boxes or if they had committed any crimes,” IJ wrote in an earlier statement.
The obviously unconstitutional raid brought a lawsuit by citizens who were essentially robbed at gunpoint by FBI agents.
“On December 7, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit heard IJ's appeal on behalf of customers of US Private Vaults. And their questions showed them to be highly skeptical of the government's actions,” the IJ reports. “Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr., for instance, drew parallels between the FBI's tactics and the abusive searches conducted by British authorities prior to the Revolutionary War. Judge Carlos Bea expressed incredulity at the idea that drug-sniffing dogs could help reunite owners with their property. And Judge Lawrence VanDyke stated that he viewed the case and the government's forfeiture plans as ‘outrageous' and ‘egregious.'”
“With the panel seemingly poised to issue a strong ruling against the government, DOJ attorneys are throwing a Hail Mary to avoid accountability. In a filing last week, the government claimed to understand the panel's ‘serious Fourth Amendment concerns about the inventory search conducted at Private Vaults,'” the IJ reports
“Yet, rather than take its medicine, the government has suggested that the court should instead send the case back down so the district court can silently grant plaintiffs their requested relief and close out the case. IJ is opposing the motion,” the group adds.
An adverse ruling against the government could be a blow to “asset forfeiture,” a scheme that allows law enforcement agencies to seize cash and property from citizens and keep it for themselves, without a conviction or even an allegation of a crime.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
FBI Agents Looted Safe Deposit Boxes Of Law-Abiding Citizens, Lawsuit Alleges
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
ANALYSIS – Is Trump regretting his VP pick? Will Trump tell Vance he is “fired”? When former President Donald Trump selected J.D. Vance as his vice presidential candidate soon after surviving an assassination attempt, some called the choice bold and a doubling down on Trumpism.
I said he could help Trump make his case in 2024 and be the GOP standard bearer in 2028. Still, I also said I would have preferred Trump had picked a woman, and that I had some reservations about Vance as VP, including his youth and inexperience.
Fox News’ Kilmeade Fires Back At Racism Allegations
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
The Federal Bureau of Investigation opened the safe deposit boxes of law-abiding citizens who had not been accused of any crime, made copies of personal records and kept personal property and cash, a federal lawsuit alleges.
Now, the FBI and Justice Department of Justice are asking the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to quietly send a class action lawsuit brought by box owners back down to a lower court without ruling on whether the raid and seizures violated the U.S. Constitution.
“The government's actions are shameless, and we hope the court will see through this attempt to sweep a massive constitutional violation under the rug,” said Rob Johnson, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice, which brought the lawsuit.
“In March 2021, the FBI raided US Private Vaults, a Beverly Hills safe deposit box company. Even though the warrant authorizing the raid only permitted the FBI to open boxes to identify their owners and safeguard the contents, agents opened hundreds of boxes, ran currency they found in front of drug sniffing dogs, and made copies of peoples' most personal records,” the IJ reports.
The scheme was part of a plan by the FBI to loot property from safe deposit boxes, without so much as even alleging a crime.
“It later came out that, months before applying for the warrant, the government had already decided to try to permanently keep everything worth more than $5,000 from the boxes, all without charging any box renter with a crime,” the IJ reports.
“Why $5,000? Because $5,000 is the FBI's minimum monetary threshold for forfeitures. In other words, the government testified that it planned to seize and administratively forfeit every box renter's property so long as it thought it would make money on the deal. It planned this despite not knowing who those renters were, what was in their boxes or if they had committed any crimes,” IJ wrote in an earlier statement.
The obviously unconstitutional raid brought a lawsuit by citizens who were essentially robbed at gunpoint by FBI agents.
“On December 7, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit heard IJ's appeal on behalf of customers of US Private Vaults. And their questions showed them to be highly skeptical of the government's actions,” the IJ reports. “Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr., for instance, drew parallels between the FBI's tactics and the abusive searches conducted by British authorities prior to the Revolutionary War. Judge Carlos Bea expressed incredulity at the idea that drug-sniffing dogs could help reunite owners with their property. And Judge Lawrence VanDyke stated that he viewed the case and the government's forfeiture plans as ‘outrageous' and ‘egregious.'”
“With the panel seemingly poised to issue a strong ruling against the government, DOJ attorneys are throwing a Hail Mary to avoid accountability. In a filing last week, the government claimed to understand the panel's ‘serious Fourth Amendment concerns about the inventory search conducted at Private Vaults,'” the IJ reports
“Yet, rather than take its medicine, the government has suggested that the court should instead send the case back down so the district court can silently grant plaintiffs their requested relief and close out the case. IJ is opposing the motion,” the group adds.
An adverse ruling against the government could be a blow to “asset forfeiture,” a scheme that allows law enforcement agencies to seize cash and property from citizens and keep it for themselves, without a conviction or even an allegation of a crime.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
Donny Ferguson
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
Search
follow us
subscribe
Trending Stories
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
ANALYSIS – Is Trump regretting his VP pick? WillBacklash Grows As Harley-Davidson Infected With Woke Virus
ANALYSIS – Say it isn’t so! Even asProject 2025 Will Return Sanity To Our Woke Military
ANALYSIS – “I disagree with some of the thingsNew Impeachment Investigation Launched Into Allegations Hunter Biden Invoked Joe’s Name
Congressional investigators are looking into further allegations againstCommentary
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
Smoke Shop Shooting: 71-Year-Old Stops Armed Burglar
Security
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
US Support For Israel In Its War Must Be ‘Ironclad’
US Fighters Intercept Chinese And Russian Bombers Near Alaska
Foreign Affairs
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Attacks Disrupt Paris: Major Infrastructure Targeted Hours Before Olympic Games
US Fighters Intercept Chinese And Russian Bombers Near Alaska
Disruptions Linger After IT Update Crashes Computer Systems Worldwide
Business & economics
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
Elon’s ‘Final Straw’ To Cost California Millions
Meet The Man Who Tracks Pelosi’s Investments – Guess His Earnings Last Month?
Congress Investigating Whether Woke Activists Broke Federal Tax Law With ESG Investment Schemes
heath & science
Old School Sold For Next To Nothing To Planned Parenthood
Elon Musk On Estranged Child: ‘Killed By The Woke Mind Virus’
Congressman Claims Biden Didn’t Recognize Him Despite Their Friendship
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee Succumbs To Pancreatic Cancer
American Liberty Arms
Trump Shooter Put in Range Time Weeks Before Assassination Attempt
Armed Georgia Man And A Labradoodle Capture Inmate
More Anti-Gun Groups Fabricating Mass Shooting Data
The Truck Gun For Active Killer Interdiction: Realistic?
At American Liberty News, we eschew the mainstream media’s tightly controlled narrative to provide our readers with real news, real insights, and the means to take action. We seek out insightful coverage – and partner with knowledgeable and experienced people and organizations to bring you the information and insight our readers demand.
We humbly seek to provide the tools and information necessary for our readers to decide for themselves what is true and what is right.
TOP TAGS
TOP CATEGORIES
FEATURES
American Liberty News ©2022
Evolution Digital Media | 1900 Reston Metro Plz | Suite 600 | Reston, VA 20190