Politicians are upset, beside themselves, worried and all manner of concerned about the latest horror to be unleashed on political campaigns. No, it isn't robo-dialing or door knockers. It's artificial intelligence “deep fake'” images and recordings that threaten, the pols believe, to undermine what few shreds of trust people have in politics.
And they intend to do it through legislation:
“States know that there's going to have to be some regulatory guardrails,” said Tim Storey, president and chief executive of the National Conference of State Legislatures, which convened the A.I. panel at a conference in December. “It's almost trying to figure out what's happening in real time.”
Which is another way of saying that lawmakers are late to the game, and the A.I. admakers – professional and amateur alike – are already miles ahead of the regulators.
But that will never stop some from trying to do what is akin to closing the barn door after all the horses have run away:
Some legislators have contemplated banning misleading A.I. ads altogether. But political ads generally are given a lot of latitude in what they can say, and to avoid any First Amendment challenges, most lawmakers have focused on requiring that those who make, produce or disseminate the ads disclose — in legible text or clear audio — that the deceptive ads were produced by artificial intelligence.
Many of the bills apply only to such ads that are released up to 90 days before an election, when voters are paying the most attention.
Good luck with that.
On the whole, though, one might be tempted – if only for a moment – to sympathize with the politicians trying to ensure that fake ads don't pollute the airwaves. There's an argument to be made – and so far, it's incumbents who have the most to lose making it – that such high-tech fakery has no place in our civic discourse.
But let's also be very clear about fakery in politics: they go together like peas and carrots.
As the great Brooks Jackson wrote way back in 2004, “…[c]andidates have a legal right to lie to voters just about as much as they want.”
It's not just the First Amendment that gives them this latitude. It's a host of court cases striking down various “truth in advertising” laws states passed to limit lying in political ads. Jackson notes examples of candidates straight-up lying in televisions ads and getting charged for it in state courts.
The state courts weren't having it. The Washington Supreme Court ruled in a truth-in-advertising case that the law against lying in campaign ads was unconstitutional:
Instead of relying on the State to silence false political speech, the First Amendment requires our dependence on even more speech to bring forth truth. … The First Amendment exists precisely to protect against laws such as [the Washington state truth-in-advertising law] which suppress ideas and inhibit free discussion of governmental affairs.
The dissenters wrote that the majority opinion made the court the first…
‘..in the history of the Republic to declare First Amendment protection for calculated lies' and said that his fellow judges were ‘shockingly oblivious to the increasing nastiness of modern political campaigns.'
Pity that judge for not having the ability to anticipate artificial intelligence churning out fakes like there was no tomorrow.
But really, pity that judge – nor the lawmakers seeking to curb A.I. — for not understanding (or refusing to admit) that there has never been a golden era of truth and accountability in politics. It is now, and always has been a (sometimes literally) bruising affair, with truth being the first thing to get flattened.
While mild restrictions like requiring a notice that A.I. was used to create an ad might pass legal muster, such requirements will do nothing to curb the lies.
That job is, as it always has been, up to the individual voter. That may chill some readers to the bone. But the Washington Supreme Court had it right: politics doesn't need a state-run censor.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: Bolsonaro And Allies Formally Accused Of Coup By Federal Police
Political Industry Braces For Impact Of AI Technology
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
ANALYSIS – Is Trump regretting his VP pick? Will Trump tell Vance he is “fired”? When former President Donald Trump selected J.D. Vance as his vice presidential candidate soon after surviving an assassination attempt, some called the choice bold and a doubling down on Trumpism.
I said he could help Trump make his case in 2024 and be the GOP standard bearer in 2028. Still, I also said I would have preferred Trump had picked a woman, and that I had some reservations about Vance as VP, including his youth and inexperience.
Fox News’ Kilmeade Fires Back At Racism Allegations
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
Politicians are upset, beside themselves, worried and all manner of concerned about the latest horror to be unleashed on political campaigns. No, it isn't robo-dialing or door knockers. It's artificial intelligence “deep fake'” images and recordings that threaten, the pols believe, to undermine what few shreds of trust people have in politics.
And they intend to do it through legislation:
Which is another way of saying that lawmakers are late to the game, and the A.I. admakers – professional and amateur alike – are already miles ahead of the regulators.
But that will never stop some from trying to do what is akin to closing the barn door after all the horses have run away:
Good luck with that.
On the whole, though, one might be tempted – if only for a moment – to sympathize with the politicians trying to ensure that fake ads don't pollute the airwaves. There's an argument to be made – and so far, it's incumbents who have the most to lose making it – that such high-tech fakery has no place in our civic discourse.
But let's also be very clear about fakery in politics: they go together like peas and carrots.
As the great Brooks Jackson wrote way back in 2004, “…[c]andidates have a legal right to lie to voters just about as much as they want.”
It's not just the First Amendment that gives them this latitude. It's a host of court cases striking down various “truth in advertising” laws states passed to limit lying in political ads. Jackson notes examples of candidates straight-up lying in televisions ads and getting charged for it in state courts.
The state courts weren't having it. The Washington Supreme Court ruled in a truth-in-advertising case that the law against lying in campaign ads was unconstitutional:
The dissenters wrote that the majority opinion made the court the first…
Pity that judge for not having the ability to anticipate artificial intelligence churning out fakes like there was no tomorrow.
But really, pity that judge – nor the lawmakers seeking to curb A.I. — for not understanding (or refusing to admit) that there has never been a golden era of truth and accountability in politics. It is now, and always has been a (sometimes literally) bruising affair, with truth being the first thing to get flattened.
While mild restrictions like requiring a notice that A.I. was used to create an ad might pass legal muster, such requirements will do nothing to curb the lies.
That job is, as it always has been, up to the individual voter. That may chill some readers to the bone. But the Washington Supreme Court had it right: politics doesn't need a state-run censor.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: Bolsonaro And Allies Formally Accused Of Coup By Federal Police
Norman Leahy
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
Search
follow us
subscribe
Trending Stories
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
ANALYSIS – Is Trump regretting his VP pick? WillBacklash Grows As Harley-Davidson Infected With Woke Virus
ANALYSIS – Say it isn’t so! Even asProject 2025 Will Return Sanity To Our Woke Military
ANALYSIS – “I disagree with some of the thingsNew Impeachment Investigation Launched Into Allegations Hunter Biden Invoked Joe’s Name
Congressional investigators are looking into further allegations againstCommentary
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
Smoke Shop Shooting: 71-Year-Old Stops Armed Burglar
Security
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
US Support For Israel In Its War Must Be ‘Ironclad’
US Fighters Intercept Chinese And Russian Bombers Near Alaska
Foreign Affairs
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Attacks Disrupt Paris: Major Infrastructure Targeted Hours Before Olympic Games
US Fighters Intercept Chinese And Russian Bombers Near Alaska
Disruptions Linger After IT Update Crashes Computer Systems Worldwide
Business & economics
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
Elon’s ‘Final Straw’ To Cost California Millions
Meet The Man Who Tracks Pelosi’s Investments – Guess His Earnings Last Month?
Congress Investigating Whether Woke Activists Broke Federal Tax Law With ESG Investment Schemes
heath & science
Old School Sold For Next To Nothing To Planned Parenthood
Elon Musk On Estranged Child: ‘Killed By The Woke Mind Virus’
Congressman Claims Biden Didn’t Recognize Him Despite Their Friendship
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee Succumbs To Pancreatic Cancer
American Liberty Arms
Trump Shooter Put in Range Time Weeks Before Assassination Attempt
Armed Georgia Man And A Labradoodle Capture Inmate
More Anti-Gun Groups Fabricating Mass Shooting Data
The Truck Gun For Active Killer Interdiction: Realistic?
At American Liberty News, we eschew the mainstream media’s tightly controlled narrative to provide our readers with real news, real insights, and the means to take action. We seek out insightful coverage – and partner with knowledgeable and experienced people and organizations to bring you the information and insight our readers demand.
We humbly seek to provide the tools and information necessary for our readers to decide for themselves what is true and what is right.
TOP TAGS
TOP CATEGORIES
FEATURES
American Liberty News ©2022
Evolution Digital Media | 1900 Reston Metro Plz | Suite 600 | Reston, VA 20190