ANALYSIS – This weekend, former President Donald Trump remarked that he might let “delinquent” NATO members get invaded by Russia and even encourage it. And by delinquent, Trump meant not paying their minimum NATO required share of at least 2% of GDP on defense.
Specifically, Trump told supporters at a campaign rally a possibly true tale about the time he told a European leader that the U.S. would not protect a European country from Russian invasion if it had failed to meet NATO's defense spending goal.
“In fact,” Trump said, “I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want.”
The reaction was angry and immediate. The Joe Biden White House swiftly called Trump's comments “appalling and unhinged.”
But are they really? Or is Trump on to something?
At first glance Trump's remarks may sound nuts to many of us brought up on the notion of collective defense as embodied in Article 5 of the NATO charter – “an attack on any one member is an attack on all.”
This generally means the U.S. coming to help defend Europe, including with nukes if necessary. But NATO isn't only about that.
Collective self-defense also presupposes collective shared responsibility, as in each member paying their fair share of the group effort. In the NATO case it is simply 2% of GDP on defense for every member, which is small and proportional to the member's economies.
And the fact is that most members haven't been shouldering their burden.
But Trump isn't the first American leader to complain.
Daniel DePetris notes in The Spectator:
In November 1959, ten years after NATO's creation, then-president Dwight D. Eisenhower told one of his generals that European members were in essence playing the US for fools. A decade later, defense secretary Melvin Laird wrote to Richard Nixon that the US “has told its Allies for the past several years that they can and should take over a greater share of Europe's direct defense.” Ditto Barack Obama, who bluntly told the Atlantic during an… interview that “free riders aggravate me.”
Since then, Europe has only grown much bigger, more unified and far wealthier. This, as the old Soviet threat withered. Still, as De Petris adds:
While Americans may not want the US to get out of NATO, they do find it objectionable that the US is doing most of the legwork in keeping Europe whole, free and at peace while the rest of the alliance — Britain, Poland and the Baltic states excluded — basically resembles a bunch of twenty-five-year-old couch potatoes sitting in their parents' basement, taking indefinite support for granted.
Sure, this analogy will make a lot of Europeans upset, but how else to describe a situation in which almost two-thirds of NATO members are still failing to meet NATO's 2 percent of GDP metric nearly seventeen years after it was first established?
To believe a continent with a $17 trillion GDP doesn't have the financial resources to fulfill those obligations is ludicrous, and we shouldn't pretend otherwise.
And that is the same now with helping defend Ukraine. I have repeatedly argued that the U.S. should help support Ukraine, but Europe must lead the way and pay their equal or larger share.
So, Trump has resorted to “shock therapy.”
As Ross Clark writes separately in The Spectator:
…someone has to shock NATO's laggards into keeping their side of the bargain. Trump has tried this tactic before, at the 2018 NATO summit in Brussels, when he described Germany as a “captive of Russia” owing to its decision to spend billions on the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline to import Russian gas, while spending only 1.23 percent of GDP on defense.
Not only was Trump proved right about the pipeline and Germany's reliance on Russian gas — but his shock tactic of suggesting that the US might lose patience with defending Europe did have some effect. At the time of the 2018 summit only four countries were meeting the two percent target… Five countries were spending less than 1 percent, including the summit host Belgium… Most member states had failed to take any notice of Barack Obama's polite requests to take their defense more seriously. Since 2018, however, a further six countries have hit the 2 percent target.
So, Trump's tactic has worked before, as many were loath to admit. However, this time his remarks may be very different.
The trouble with Trump's remarks about Putin, however, are that they do not amount to an idle threat; rather they are an invitation to a villain who doesn't need much in the way of encouragement. That is an argument for saying that Trump really has overstepped the mark this time and put Europe in peril.
But if his remarks do as intended and quickly jolt recalcitrant NATO members into action to beef up their defenses then hopefully the end result might be to make Putin less inclined to strike. Not for the first time, Trump's sheer unpredictability may prove to have its uses.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: Paid Anti-Gun Activist Mr. ‘Love' Sentenced To 10 Years On Gun, Drug Charges
Biden Said Trump Remarks On NATO Are ‘Unhinged’? Are They?
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
ANALYSIS – Is Trump regretting his VP pick? Will Trump tell Vance he is “fired”? When former President Donald Trump selected J.D. Vance as his vice presidential candidate soon after surviving an assassination attempt, some called the choice bold and a doubling down on Trumpism.
I said he could help Trump make his case in 2024 and be the GOP standard bearer in 2028. Still, I also said I would have preferred Trump had picked a woman, and that I had some reservations about Vance as VP, including his youth and inexperience.
Fox News’ Kilmeade Fires Back At Racism Allegations
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
ANALYSIS – This weekend, former President Donald Trump remarked that he might let “delinquent” NATO members get invaded by Russia and even encourage it. And by delinquent, Trump meant not paying their minimum NATO required share of at least 2% of GDP on defense.
Specifically, Trump told supporters at a campaign rally a possibly true tale about the time he told a European leader that the U.S. would not protect a European country from Russian invasion if it had failed to meet NATO's defense spending goal.
“In fact,” Trump said, “I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want.”
The reaction was angry and immediate. The Joe Biden White House swiftly called Trump's comments “appalling and unhinged.”
But are they really? Or is Trump on to something?
At first glance Trump's remarks may sound nuts to many of us brought up on the notion of collective defense as embodied in Article 5 of the NATO charter – “an attack on any one member is an attack on all.”
This generally means the U.S. coming to help defend Europe, including with nukes if necessary. But NATO isn't only about that.
Collective self-defense also presupposes collective shared responsibility, as in each member paying their fair share of the group effort. In the NATO case it is simply 2% of GDP on defense for every member, which is small and proportional to the member's economies.
And the fact is that most members haven't been shouldering their burden.
But Trump isn't the first American leader to complain.
Daniel DePetris notes in The Spectator:
Since then, Europe has only grown much bigger, more unified and far wealthier. This, as the old Soviet threat withered. Still, as De Petris adds:
And that is the same now with helping defend Ukraine. I have repeatedly argued that the U.S. should help support Ukraine, but Europe must lead the way and pay their equal or larger share.
So, Trump has resorted to “shock therapy.”
As Ross Clark writes separately in The Spectator:
So, Trump's tactic has worked before, as many were loath to admit. However, this time his remarks may be very different.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: Paid Anti-Gun Activist Mr. ‘Love' Sentenced To 10 Years On Gun, Drug Charges
Paul Crespo
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
Search
follow us
subscribe
Trending Stories
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
ANALYSIS – Is Trump regretting his VP pick? WillBacklash Grows As Harley-Davidson Infected With Woke Virus
ANALYSIS – Say it isn’t so! Even asProject 2025 Will Return Sanity To Our Woke Military
ANALYSIS – “I disagree with some of the thingsNew Impeachment Investigation Launched Into Allegations Hunter Biden Invoked Joe’s Name
Congressional investigators are looking into further allegations againstCommentary
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
Smoke Shop Shooting: 71-Year-Old Stops Armed Burglar
Security
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
US Support For Israel In Its War Must Be ‘Ironclad’
US Fighters Intercept Chinese And Russian Bombers Near Alaska
Foreign Affairs
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Attacks Disrupt Paris: Major Infrastructure Targeted Hours Before Olympic Games
US Fighters Intercept Chinese And Russian Bombers Near Alaska
Disruptions Linger After IT Update Crashes Computer Systems Worldwide
Business & economics
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
Elon’s ‘Final Straw’ To Cost California Millions
Meet The Man Who Tracks Pelosi’s Investments – Guess His Earnings Last Month?
Congress Investigating Whether Woke Activists Broke Federal Tax Law With ESG Investment Schemes
heath & science
Old School Sold For Next To Nothing To Planned Parenthood
Elon Musk On Estranged Child: ‘Killed By The Woke Mind Virus’
Congressman Claims Biden Didn’t Recognize Him Despite Their Friendship
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee Succumbs To Pancreatic Cancer
American Liberty Arms
Trump Shooter Put in Range Time Weeks Before Assassination Attempt
Armed Georgia Man And A Labradoodle Capture Inmate
More Anti-Gun Groups Fabricating Mass Shooting Data
The Truck Gun For Active Killer Interdiction: Realistic?
At American Liberty News, we eschew the mainstream media’s tightly controlled narrative to provide our readers with real news, real insights, and the means to take action. We seek out insightful coverage – and partner with knowledgeable and experienced people and organizations to bring you the information and insight our readers demand.
We humbly seek to provide the tools and information necessary for our readers to decide for themselves what is true and what is right.
TOP TAGS
TOP CATEGORIES
FEATURES
American Liberty News ©2022
Evolution Digital Media | 1900 Reston Metro Plz | Suite 600 | Reston, VA 20190