ANALYSIS – Well, according to the media that is what former President Donald Trump's lawyers are saying. In a bizarre exchange in court, Trump attorney John Sauer argued that, under certain circumstances, a president could order SEAL Team Six (more accurately known as DevGru) to assassinate a domestic political rival and not face prosecution.
But the scenario is silly and the truth is a bit more complicated.
While no president is supposed to be above the law. And no president has absolute immunity or can commit crimes with impunity (the ability to act without negative consequences), no former president has ever been indicted before in our nation's history, either.
Why? Because the Founding Fathers were far more concerned about presidents facing politicalized persecutions masquerading as criminal prosecutions, than with them getting away with murder.
What Trump's lawyers are arguing is that a president has presidential immunity (freedom from prosecution) for any conduct done as “official acts” while he is president. In order to criminally prosecute a president, he must first be impeached and convicted by Congress.
In this view of the Constitution, that political action is what removes his presidential immunity. As Business Insider noted flippantly in its headline: “President can have rival assassinated if Congress is OK with it.”
It's a silly example. But it makes headlines, and that's why the judge brought it.
During questioning from Judge Florence Pan, nominated by Biden in 2022, and one member of the three-judge panel from the D.C. Court of Appeals hearing Trump's case, one hypothetical scenario was raised about a president assassinating a rival as an official act ordering our Tier One SEALs to do it.
Of course, this deliberately absurd scenario ignores the fact that no American military unit or personnel would obey that clearly unlawful order. We are all duty, and legally, bound to ignore or refuse unlawful orders.
But Judge Pan asked anyway: “Could a president who ordered SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival, who was not impeached, would he be subject to criminal prosecution.”
To which Sauer replied: “If he were impeached and convicted first.” Judge Pan then said: “So your answer is no.” Sauer repeated his point by saying: “My answer is qualified. Yes. There's a political process that will have to occur under the structure of our Constitution, which would require impeachment and conviction by the Senate in these exceptional cases…”
This elicited a shocked response from opposing counsel, reported the New York Post: “What kind of world are we living in” if a president could use the state to assassinate a political rival and not be prosecuted for it, asked assistant special counsel James Pearce.
Pearce, arguing on behalf of special counsel Jack Smith, added that it would be a “frightening future” if a president couldn't be held accountable for crimes and said the sweeping presidential immunity that Sauer was suggesting would put a commander-in-chief “above the law.”
But Sauer fired back later, saying: “The frightening future [Pearce] alleges where presidents are very, very, seldom, if ever, prosecuted because they have to be impeached and convicted first is the one we have lived under for the last 235 years.”
“That's not a frightening future. That's our republic.”
Sauer then made the more important constitutional point that the founders were much more worried political opponents using criminal prosecution to discipline presidents.
He added:
They were much more concerned about the abuse of the criminal process for political purposes, to disable the presidency from factions and political opponents. And, of course, that's exactly what we see in this case.
Using a more realistic scenario of a president selling pardons, which Judge Pan also brought up, Sauer said:
…the sale of pardons example is an excellent example, because there were allegations about a sale of a pardon, essentially, when it came to President Clinton's, uh, pardon of Marc Rich and the US DOJ, carefully and for the very reasons we've emphasized in our brief, decided not to prosecute President Clinton with that because it raised concerns about whether or not a president could be prosecuted for his official acts…
Perhaps these judges, and the media should focus on these more realistic scenarios, and try to better understand the founders' intent, rather than make up nonsense about a president openly and “officially” killing his rival and getting away with it.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: Epstein's Brother Drops Nuke On Fmr. Republican Star
Media Claims Trump Lawyers Argued President Can Order SEALs To Eliminate Rivals
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
ANALYSIS – Is Trump regretting his VP pick? Will Trump tell Vance he is “fired”? When former President Donald Trump selected J.D. Vance as his vice presidential candidate soon after surviving an assassination attempt, some called the choice bold and a doubling down on Trumpism.
I said he could help Trump make his case in 2024 and be the GOP standard bearer in 2028. Still, I also said I would have preferred Trump had picked a woman, and that I had some reservations about Vance as VP, including his youth and inexperience.
Fox News’ Kilmeade Fires Back At Racism Allegations
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
ANALYSIS – Well, according to the media that is what former President Donald Trump's lawyers are saying. In a bizarre exchange in court, Trump attorney John Sauer argued that, under certain circumstances, a president could order SEAL Team Six (more accurately known as DevGru) to assassinate a domestic political rival and not face prosecution.
But the scenario is silly and the truth is a bit more complicated.
While no president is supposed to be above the law. And no president has absolute immunity or can commit crimes with impunity (the ability to act without negative consequences), no former president has ever been indicted before in our nation's history, either.
Why? Because the Founding Fathers were far more concerned about presidents facing politicalized persecutions masquerading as criminal prosecutions, than with them getting away with murder.
What Trump's lawyers are arguing is that a president has presidential immunity (freedom from prosecution) for any conduct done as “official acts” while he is president. In order to criminally prosecute a president, he must first be impeached and convicted by Congress.
In this view of the Constitution, that political action is what removes his presidential immunity. As Business Insider noted flippantly in its headline: “President can have rival assassinated if Congress is OK with it.”
It's a silly example. But it makes headlines, and that's why the judge brought it.
During questioning from Judge Florence Pan, nominated by Biden in 2022, and one member of the three-judge panel from the D.C. Court of Appeals hearing Trump's case, one hypothetical scenario was raised about a president assassinating a rival as an official act ordering our Tier One SEALs to do it.
Of course, this deliberately absurd scenario ignores the fact that no American military unit or personnel would obey that clearly unlawful order. We are all duty, and legally, bound to ignore or refuse unlawful orders.
But Judge Pan asked anyway: “Could a president who ordered SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival, who was not impeached, would he be subject to criminal prosecution.”
To which Sauer replied: “If he were impeached and convicted first.” Judge Pan then said: “So your answer is no.” Sauer repeated his point by saying: “My answer is qualified. Yes. There's a political process that will have to occur under the structure of our Constitution, which would require impeachment and conviction by the Senate in these exceptional cases…”
This elicited a shocked response from opposing counsel, reported the New York Post: “What kind of world are we living in” if a president could use the state to assassinate a political rival and not be prosecuted for it, asked assistant special counsel James Pearce.
Pearce, arguing on behalf of special counsel Jack Smith, added that it would be a “frightening future” if a president couldn't be held accountable for crimes and said the sweeping presidential immunity that Sauer was suggesting would put a commander-in-chief “above the law.”
But Sauer fired back later, saying: “The frightening future [Pearce] alleges where presidents are very, very, seldom, if ever, prosecuted because they have to be impeached and convicted first is the one we have lived under for the last 235 years.”
“That's not a frightening future. That's our republic.”
Sauer then made the more important constitutional point that the founders were much more worried political opponents using criminal prosecution to discipline presidents.
He added:
Using a more realistic scenario of a president selling pardons, which Judge Pan also brought up, Sauer said:
Perhaps these judges, and the media should focus on these more realistic scenarios, and try to better understand the founders' intent, rather than make up nonsense about a president openly and “officially” killing his rival and getting away with it.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: Epstein's Brother Drops Nuke On Fmr. Republican Star
Paul Crespo
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
Search
follow us
subscribe
Trending Stories
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
ANALYSIS – Is Trump regretting his VP pick? WillBacklash Grows As Harley-Davidson Infected With Woke Virus
ANALYSIS – Say it isn’t so! Even asProject 2025 Will Return Sanity To Our Woke Military
ANALYSIS – “I disagree with some of the thingsNew Impeachment Investigation Launched Into Allegations Hunter Biden Invoked Joe’s Name
Congressional investigators are looking into further allegations againstCommentary
Will Trump Dump JD Vance?
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
Smoke Shop Shooting: 71-Year-Old Stops Armed Burglar
Security
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Kamala Harris ‘Owns’ All Of Biden’s Many National Security Failures
US Support For Israel In Its War Must Be ‘Ironclad’
US Fighters Intercept Chinese And Russian Bombers Near Alaska
Foreign Affairs
Trump’s ‘Dying Wish’ Exposed – What He Wants If Assassinated
Attacks Disrupt Paris: Major Infrastructure Targeted Hours Before Olympic Games
US Fighters Intercept Chinese And Russian Bombers Near Alaska
Disruptions Linger After IT Update Crashes Computer Systems Worldwide
Business & economics
Does This Single Fact Signal Our Imminent Financial Collapse?
Elon’s ‘Final Straw’ To Cost California Millions
Meet The Man Who Tracks Pelosi’s Investments – Guess His Earnings Last Month?
Congress Investigating Whether Woke Activists Broke Federal Tax Law With ESG Investment Schemes
heath & science
Old School Sold For Next To Nothing To Planned Parenthood
Elon Musk On Estranged Child: ‘Killed By The Woke Mind Virus’
Congressman Claims Biden Didn’t Recognize Him Despite Their Friendship
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee Succumbs To Pancreatic Cancer
American Liberty Arms
Trump Shooter Put in Range Time Weeks Before Assassination Attempt
Armed Georgia Man And A Labradoodle Capture Inmate
More Anti-Gun Groups Fabricating Mass Shooting Data
The Truck Gun For Active Killer Interdiction: Realistic?
At American Liberty News, we eschew the mainstream media’s tightly controlled narrative to provide our readers with real news, real insights, and the means to take action. We seek out insightful coverage – and partner with knowledgeable and experienced people and organizations to bring you the information and insight our readers demand.
We humbly seek to provide the tools and information necessary for our readers to decide for themselves what is true and what is right.
TOP TAGS
TOP CATEGORIES
FEATURES
American Liberty News ©2022
Evolution Digital Media | 1900 Reston Metro Plz | Suite 600 | Reston, VA 20190