The long-awaited trial in the antitrust case against Meta begins in Washington on Monday, marking a significant moment in the ongoing scrutiny of tech giants’ market dominance. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has accused Meta of creating an illegal monopoly by acquiring Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014, alleging that these acquisitions were intended to stifle competition and consolidate Meta’s control over the social media market.
Meta, which already owned Facebook at the time of these acquisitions, has long defended its actions, and the company is confident it will prevail in the case. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has argued that both Instagram and WhatsApp have flourished under Meta’s ownership, and users have benefited from the improvements brought by the mergers. The FTC, however, is seeking to reverse these acquisitions. If the agency wins, Meta could be forced to divest both Instagram and WhatsApp, effectively undoing Zuckerberg’s vision of an all-encompassing social media empire.
At the heart of the FTC’s case is the claim that Meta’s purchases of Instagram and WhatsApp were strategic moves to eliminate rising competitive threats. Legal experts point to comments made by Zuckerberg himself, including his well-known assertion that “it’s better to buy than to compete.”
Rebecca Haw Allensworth, a professor of antitrust law at Vanderbilt, argues that Zuckerberg’s own words could serve as powerful evidence in the trial. Allensworth also pointed out that the FTC will likely emphasize how Instagram’s rapid rise as a direct competitor to Facebook was abruptly neutralized when it was acquired by Meta.
Meta’s defense is expected to focus on the claim that the merger benefited consumers. “The real question is: are consumers better off as a result of this merger?” said Allensworth. The company will likely argue that Instagram’s growth and success would not have been possible without Meta’s financial backing and infrastructure.
Zuckerberg, along with former COO Sheryl Sandberg, are expected to testify in the trial, which could stretch on for several weeks. The trial is expected to scrutinize internal communications and documents that could shed light on Meta’s intentions behind acquiring the platforms. While Meta is confident about its position, the case could set a significant precedent in antitrust law and the future of tech mergers.
Adding a layer of complexity to the case are the shifting political dynamics surrounding the trial. Zuckerberg, who has had a fraught relationship with Trump due to the social media giant’s ban on Trump’s accounts following January 6, reportedly lobbied Trump in person to have the FTC drop the case.
“The evidence at trial will show what every 17-year-old in the world knows: Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp compete with Chinese-owned TikTok, YouTube, X, iMessage, and many others,” a Meta spokesperson said.
READ NEXT: Meta Terminates DEI Programs
I am disgusted that this and other sites are used to display the torture of animals and other barbaric things. People who do this should be sent to prison, not amplified. Does Meta have any filters?
It is disconcerting that Meta is the big prize when Google is the biggest conglomeration that should be trust busted. They have their hands and noses in everything. SPLIT THAT MONSTER UP.