A federal judge has temporarily halted a key provision in President Donald Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” that would have stripped Planned Parenthood of Medicaid funding for one year, handing the organization an early legal victory in its challenge against the defunding measure.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, appointed by former President Barack Obama, issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) on Monday just hours after Planned Parenthood filed its lawsuit in federal court. The TRO blocks the federal government from enforcing the Medicaid provision for 14 days, requiring the Department of Health and Human Services to continue disbursing funds in the meantime.
Planned Parenthood’s lawsuit, Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., claims the Trump-backed provision violates the Constitution by targeting the organization for political reasons. While the language of the bill does not explicitly name Planned Parenthood, the group argues that it is the only provider affected by the criteria outlined.
“This law was written to punish us, and only us,” Planned Parenthood said in a statement following the ruling.
According to court documents, nearly 200 clinics in 24 states could face closure due to the provision. The organization argued that the funding cut would have “devastating effects,” leading to staff layoffs, reduced services, and mass closures — even for patients who do not rely on Medicaid.
The provision in question was part of a broader Republican effort to defund abortion providers through budget reconciliation — a process that allows the Senate to bypass the usual 60-vote threshold. The Trump administration and pro-life allies argue that, although the Hyde Amendment bars direct federal funding for abortions, no taxpayer money should support any organization that performs them.
“The Trump Administration is ending the forced use of Federal taxpayer dollars to fund or promote elective abortion – a commonsense position that the overwhelming majority of Americans agree with,” a White House official told CBS News in response to the ruling.
The federal government has not yet indicated whether it will appeal the TRO, though legal observers expect the case to quickly move to the appellate level.
Conservative lawmakers denounced the court order, calling it judicial overreach and a violation of congressional authority.
“Unless I’m missing something, this is an abuse of judicial power,” wrote Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) on X. “I suspect the House Judiciary Committee will consider articles of impeachment.”
“An unelected judge has no authority to override the will of 77 MILLION Americans who voted to defund Planned Parenthood,” added Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL). “Last time I checked, the Constitution gives Congress, not activist judges, the power of the purse.”
Pro-life activist Lila Rose, president of Live Action, echoed those concerns: “Unjust judicial activism that should be immediately overruled by higher courts.”
In June, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a South Carolina law blocking Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid reimbursements, finding that the organization did not have standing to sue under a federal civil rights law.
However, the Massachusetts case now becomes the central legal battleground over national Medicaid restrictions. If upheld, Trump’s Medicaid ban would effectively defund Planned Parenthood for one year — a symbolic and substantive victory for the pro-life movement that has sought this outcome for decades.
READ NEXT: A Ruling In This Federal Case Could Destroy Planned Parenthood
I thought the Supreme Court ruled that district judges could no longer issue such blockages of national-level laws and executive orders. Just say no to these rogue judges.
The defunding of Medicaid is a Federal crime, as far as I am concerned. If anything, it was un-American.
I was really hoping SCOTUS would rule to protect Medicaid.
HEY DUMBASS, THATS A LAW THAT WAS PASSED BY CONGRESS SO UPHOLD IT.
THIS IS REALLY STUPID. A FEDERAL JUDGE HAS NO JURISDICTION ON LAWS PASSED BY CONGRESS. THIS JUDGE ISN’T STUPID. HE KNOWS HE CAN’T STOP A LAW PASSED BY CONGRESS. HE IS JUST BEING POLITICAL AND WANTS TO GUM UP THE TRUMP POLICIES. HE SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE BENCH IN WASTING TAXPAYERS DOLLARS. SHAMEFULL AND COMPLETELY UNETHICAL. I WISH THE SUPREME COURT WOULD COME DOWN AND REALLY SLAM THESE ROGUE JUSTICES.
Nothing in the Constitution requires funding any private organization. It is theoretically possible to argue the President can’t defund an organization Congress appropriated funds for. Arguing Congress can’t stop funding an organization is absurd on its face. It this isn’t a case for impeachment, we only have ONE branch of government.