A federal judge appointed by former President Barack Obama has upheld her own order blocking a key provision in President Donald Trump’s sweeping “Big, Beautiful Bill” that would cut off Medicaid reimbursements to Planned Parenthood, reigniting legal battles over abortion funding just days after the bill’s passage.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued an amended temporary restraining order (TRO) on Friday, explaining why she halted the bill’s defunding measure just hours after Planned Parenthood filed suit. The order prevents the provision from taking effect until a full hearing is held on July 18.
The Trump administration had requested the TRO be dissolved, calling it “highly unusual” given its initial lack of explanation.
In her amended decision, Talwani justified the delay by arguing that the provision was already “disrupting healthcare services” for Medicaid patients.
“The provision is already forcing some Members to turn away patients enrolled in Medicaid,” Talwani wrote. “And patients who can still access care at Planned Parenthood Member health centers could experience delays in receiving care with the law’s implementation.”
She concluded that a temporary halt was necessary to “prevent irreparable harm” while the court considers the broader constitutional claims raised by the plaintiffs.
Planned Parenthood alleges that the provision in question, which does not name the group directly but restricts Medicaid reimbursements for organizations receiving more than $800,000 and associated with abortion services, was written specifically to target the organization.
The group argues that this selective targeting violates its First Amendment rights by punishing its affiliates for their association with the national Planned Parenthood Federation.
“By including ‘affiliates,’ [the provision] burdens Planned Parenthood Members’ right to associate with each other and with Planned Parenthood Federation,” Talwani wrote.
She insisted that the law creates confusion and potentially unconstitutional restrictions, especially for clinics that do not perform abortions but remain affiliated with the national organization.
The provision was a major victory for pro-life Republicans, who had long argued that any organization involved in abortion should not receive a cent of federal funding.
The Trump administration, backed by congressional Republicans, passed the measure through the reconciliation process — allowing them to bypass the 60-vote filibuster threshold in the Senate. The bill marked a significant legislative win for the GOP trifecta and was heralded as a cornerstone of Trump’s second-term agenda.
However, Friday’s judicial roadblock inspired sharp criticism from conservatives who characterized it as another example of judicial activism undermining the will of elected lawmakers.
Planned Parenthood claims the provision could lead to the closure of nearly 200 of its clinics.
According to the group’s latest annual report, the organization received $792.2 million in taxpayer funding in 2023–2024 — a nearly $100 million increase over the previous year — while performing a record 402,230 abortions in that same timeframe.
Pro-life critics argue this is proof that taxpayer funds are indirectly supporting abortion despite the Hyde Amendment, which bars federal dollars from paying for abortions except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother.
READ NEXT: Judicial Insurrection: The Obama Judge Usurping The Power Of The Purse
So very plainly out of the judiciaries lane!!! They have absolutely NOTHING to do with funding ANYTHING to include their own budgets!
Wow. Looks as if a review of BASIC CIVICS is in order.
EVERYTHING THESE ACTIVIST SO-CALLED JUDGES ARE “UNCONSTITUTIONAL” PER THE SCOTUS!!! THEREFORE, THE GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO IGNORE THESE BIASED RULINGS!!!