The New York Times is once again facing questions about its editorial judgment — this time over a hiring decision that is drawing renewed attention to a deeply controversial newsroom episode involving child sexual abuse material.
At the center of the backlash is Noah Shachtman, a newly hired editor. Critics have pointed to his past handling of a newsroom controversy, which Mediaite’s Isaac Shorr described as “a well-documented effort to cover up a pal’s child porn scandal.”
According to multiple reports, Shachtman intervened in coverage of the arrest of his friend, former ABC journalist James Gordon Meek, who was charged by the Justice Department with possessing child sexual abuse material. Critics allege the coverage was reframed to read more like an espionage story and did not clearly explain the nature of the charges.
Beyond the ethical questions raised by that characterization, the situation has prompted critics to ask whether one of the nation’s most influential news organizations is applying its standards consistently.
In October 2022, Rolling Stone was the first to report that ABC News national security producer James Gordon Meek’s home had been raided by the FBI that April. But its story about the matter bore little resemblance to reality.
That wasn’t the fault of reporter Tatiana Siegel, who had learned and wished to note that the raid was in connection with a federal investigation into images depicting child sex abuse. Shachtman, then serving as the top editor at the publication, reportedly instructed Siegel not to turn in a story with the words “child pornography” in it; and then took advantage of Siegel leaving work to tend to her dying mother by going back on an agreement to note that the FBI raid pertained to “possible criminal behavior outside the scope of Meek’s work” in her article, according to an NPR investigation.
Instead, as The Daily Beast put it at the time, “Rolling Stone’s big scoop last week, headlined ‘FBI Raids Star ABC News Producer’s Home,’ read like a Tom Clancy thriller and raised serious concerns that the feds raided a journalist over his work.”
“As published, the Rolling Stone article’s first two paragraphs lionized Meek’s record and swashbuckling style. ‘Meek appears to be on the wrong side of the national-security apparatus,’ it stated,” noted NPR. “In the hours leading up to publication, Shachtman changed Siegel’s draft to remove all suggestions that the investigation was not related to Meek’s reporting. He left in the finding that federal agents had allegedly found ‘classified information’ on Meek’s devices.”
Shachtman also played a role in shaping the story’s most visible element — its featured image. He objected to using a picture of Meek and instead instructed staff to choose a more generic visual.
“In a note posted on a newsroom-wide Slack channel,” reported NPR. “Shachtman asked photo staffers to come up with a generic photograph rather than a picture of Meek. ‘let’s not use a picture of the guy in question, james gordon meek,’ Shachtman requested, eschewing capital letters, in a post stamped ‘NEEDS PHOTO.’ ‘something FBI-y, please.’”
Professional Relationship Adds Context
Shachtman and Meek have long operated in the same national security journalism circles. Shachtman founded the Danger Room blog at Wired, where, as early as 2010, writers referred to Meek as “our friend.”
The two interacted on social media and through email, and Meek reportedly suggested story ideas and musical acts for Shachtman to cover — which Shachtman then passed along to his staff.
Shachtman later stepped down from his role at Rolling Stone in 2024 following scrutiny surrounding this editorial decision and broader management issues.
The Editorial Judgment Question
At the heart of the controversy is a question that goes beyond one editor or one newsroom:
What does responsible editorial judgment look like when personal connections intersect with sensitive reporting?
In theory, most major newsrooms operate under clear ethical guidelines:
- Disclose potential conflicts of interest
- Recuse oneself when impartiality could reasonably be questioned
- Ensure coverage decisions are made independently of personal relationships
But for Shachtman, those lines appear to have blurred — which is why even the appearance of a conflict can become a story in itself.
Meek’s fate was more severe — and warranted. He was ultimately sentenced to 72 months in prison for transportation and possession of child sexual abuse material.
According to court documents, while visiting South Carolina in February 2020, the 53-year-old used an online messaging platform on his iPhone to send and receive images and videos depicting minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, and to discuss his sexual interest in children. Some of the material involved prepubescent minors, including an infant.
Meek brought the iPhone containing the illicit material back with him to Virginia. Authorities also found that he possessed multiple electronic devices containing similar content.
As of now, The New York Times has not publicly addressed the controversy in detail.
There is no criminal allegation against Shachtman.
But there is a perception problem.
And in today’s media environment, perception can be just as powerful as proof.
READ NEXT: Vietnam Vet Left With Broken Legs After Brutal Assault — His Response Stuns
To promote more crime