In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has declared the federal bump stock ban unconstitutional. Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority, articulated that a bump stock does not transform a semiautomatic weapon into a machine gun, a pivotal distinction in the court’s decision.
BREAKING: In a 6-3 ruling, Supreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks’ ban is unlawful. @Yamiche has the latest. pic.twitter.com/ycQRKdEFwl
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) June 14, 2024
The decision marks a major victory for gun rights advocates and sets a precedent for how firearm modifications are legally interpreted. Justice Thomas’s majority opinion emphasized the technical and functional aspects of bump stocks, arguing that they do not meet the statutory definition of a machine gun.
LEGAL ALERT: The Supreme Court has struck down former President Trump's bump stock ban, ruling 6-3 that the ATF exceeded its authority when it issued the rule. The opinion was written by Justice Thomas: https://t.co/canMOuyFLv pic.twitter.com/C8SgYkESXW
— Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy) June 14, 2024
Bump stocks are devices that allow semiautomatic rifles to fire more rapidly, mimicking the firing rate of fully automatic weapons.
In her dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said: “Today, the Court puts bump stocks back in civilian hands. To do so, it casts aside Congress’s definition of ‘machinegun’ and seizes upon one that is inconsistent with the ordinary meaning of the statutory text and unsupported by context or purpose. When I see a bird that walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck. A bump-stock-equipped semiautomatic rifle fires ‘automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.’ §5845(b). Because I, like Congress, call that a machinegun, I respectfully dissent.”
Bump stocks sparked national debate after being used in the tragic 2017 Las Vegas shooting, which took the lives of 60 innocent people and injured hundreds.
At the time, the Trump administration unilaterally decided to have the ATF ban bump stocks instead of having Congress do it.
Friday’s landmark decision will likely have far-reaching consequences for gun legislation and the regulatory authority of federal agencies like the ATF.
Reactions swiftly poured in on social media.
The Supreme Court got the bump stock case right. It was an elementary statutory case, and the law was clear. I wrote about this after oral arguments. https://t.co/isQ2Yje4Df
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) June 14, 2024
BREAKING: In the 6-3 vote, SCOTUS strikes down the ATF's ban on bump stocks, claiming that the ATF exceeded its authority. The regulation was created by the Trump administration after the Las Vegas mass shooting; the Court is now to the right of the Trump administration.
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) June 14, 2024
The Supreme Court just struck down the ban on bump stocks.
— Madison Cawthorn (@CawthornforNC) June 14, 2024
Say it with me: Shall Not Be Infringed.
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Bump stocks don’t create a “machine gun” because a “machine gun” requires multiple bullets be dispensed per single trigger pull. A bump stock doesn’t change the fact that only one bullet is dispensed per trigger pull.
— Derek Debus (@derek_debus) June 14, 2024
Hope this helps 🙂 https://t.co/qug9yPjqF3
Massive win for Separation of Powers and Basic Liberty!
— TJ Roberts (@realTJRoberts) June 14, 2024
Bump Stocks are useless toys that turn money into noise. But you have a right to buy that useless toy. Congress never passed a ban on it, and any such ban would violate the 2nd Amendment. https://t.co/JhBy9lJ1wT
This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.
READ NEXT: US Capitol Police Swarm As Radical Protesters Attempt Futile Takeover
Patrick Houck is an avid political enthusiast based out of the Washington, D.C., metro area. His expertise is in campaigns and the use of targeted messaging to persuade voters. When not combing through the latest news, you can find him enjoying the company of family and friends or pursuing his love of photography.
- Patrick Houckhttps://americanliberty.news/profile/phouck/
- Patrick Houckhttps://americanliberty.news/profile/phouck/
- Patrick Houckhttps://americanliberty.news/profile/phouck/
- Patrick Houckhttps://americanliberty.news/profile/phouck/









