Virginia officials are facing the possibility of contempt proceedings after gun rights advocates accused the state of ignoring a federal court order and quietly resuming enforcement of portions of its universal background check law.
The dispute centers on a lawsuit challenging Virginia’s 2020 universal background check requirement, which mandates that most private firearm transfers be processed through a federally licensed dealer. Plaintiffs now claim state officials restarted enforcement after a federal judge had already blocked the law’s application in the case. The allegations could set up a rare showdown over whether state officials violated a court injunction.
Court Previously Blocked Enforcement
The controversy stems from a challenge brought by gun rights organizations and Virginia residents who argue the state’s universal background check law violates the Second Amendment under the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Earlier this year, a federal judge issued an injunction barring enforcement of the law against the plaintiffs while litigation continues. According to the lawsuit, the ruling was intended to allow covered individuals to conduct private firearm transfers without being forced to submit to the state’s background check process.
Plaintiffs Allege State Ignored Injunction
According to court filings highlighted by Bearing Arms, attorneys representing the plaintiffs claim Virginia State Police and other officials resumed requiring background checks despite the injunction remaining in effect.
The plaintiffs argue that licensed firearm dealers were instructed to continue processing transactions under procedures that directly conflict with the court’s order. They contend that the state’s actions effectively nullify the injunction and deny the plaintiffs the relief they were granted by the court.
As a result, the plaintiffs are reportedly asking the court to consider contempt sanctions against state officials responsible for enforcing the law.
Attorney General’s Office Defends Position
Virginia officials dispute the allegations.
According to the state’s response, officials maintain they are complying with the court’s order and argue that any confusion stems from the practical administration of firearm transfers rather than an intentional effort to defy the injunction. State attorneys also contend that certain aspects of the law remain enforceable while appeals and litigation continue.
The court will ultimately decide whether the state’s actions violated the injunction and whether any sanctions are warranted.
Broader Second Amendment Fight Continues
The case is being closely watched by gun rights advocates nationwide because it could influence how courts apply Bruen to firearm transfer laws.
Supporters of universal background checks argue the laws are essential public safety measures that help prevent prohibited individuals from obtaining firearms. Opponents counter that requiring government approval for private firearm transfers lacks historical precedent and infringes on constitutional rights.
For now, the immediate issue before the court is not the law’s ultimate constitutionality but whether Virginia officials complied with a federal judge’s order while that question is being litigated.
If the court concludes the injunction was violated, the state could face the unusual prospect of contempt proceedings against government officials in the middle of a major Second Amendment lawsuit.
READ NEXT: Minnesota’s Fraud Watchdog Joins Forces With Mike Lindell
Unconstitutional Laws will be ignored.