A congressional committee is now investigating whether the federal government influenced and censored scientific journals to cover up the role of government research in creating the COVID-19 global pandemic
Congressman Brad Wenstrup (R-OH,) chairman of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountabilty's Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, “invited the respective Editors-in-Chief of Science, Nature, and The Lancet to testify before the Select Subcommittee on Tuesday, April 16, 2024,” the Committee announced in a statement.
The Committee wants to know what role the federal government may have played in censoring top international scientific journals to spread disinformation on the origins of the COVID-19 virus.
“The hearing seeks to examine any potential inappropriate influence exerted by the federal government over research publications related to COVID-19 and ensure that the federal government is not granted undue access to the scientific review process during a future health crisis,” the Subcommittee announced.
“Science, Nature, and The Lancet serve as critical information hubs for top scientific research across the world and individually publish articles that are cited millions of times each year. After the publication of the highly controversial, ‘The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2' (‘Proximal Origin') paper — which wrongly downplayed and vilified the lab leak hypothesis during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic — concerns arose regarding the suppression of scientific discourse by federal health officials in the United States,” the Subcommittee revealed.
“The Select Subcommittee has obtained evidence that indicates Science, Nature, and The Lancet were in communication with federal government officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins,” the Subcommittee further revealed.
“Millions of people worldwide relied on Science, Nature, and The Lancet to provide scientifically accurate and impartial research during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, documents show that the federal government may have censored and manipulated the sacred scientific review processes at these journals to progress their preferred narrative about the origins of COVID-19,” said Wenstrup.
“Should these world-renowned scientific journals have done more to protect scientific discourse and ensure the peer review process was completed without outside influence? The Select Subcommittee expects the invited Editors-in-Chief to attend this hearing and address concerns that their research was inappropriately influenced by a political agenda,” said Wenstrup.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
