Boston Mayor Michelle Wu’s Office of LGBTQ+ Advancement is facing criticism after promoting a “Trans Period Pride” event for “menstrual equity” and the “experiences of transgender people who menstruate” at the Boston Public Library.
A graphic advertising the event featured a pink tampon and blue menstrual pad alongside an invitation to discuss “barriers around access to menstrual products” and the experiences of “transgender individuals who experience menstruation.”
According to organizers, attendees will receive a catered dinner and complimentary period underwear. The event is supported by several organizations, including the Mayor’s Office of LGBTQ Advancement, the Boston Alliance of LGBTQ+ Youth (BAGLY), MASS NOW and the Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition.
The Mayor’s Office of LGBTQ Advancement says its mission is to develop policies, programming and resources for Boston’s LGBTQ community.
The event quickly attracted attention online after being promoted on social media. Critics questioned the concept of a “Trans Period Pride” event and expressed disbelief at the terminology used in the promotional materials.
“This cannot be real,” one commenter wrote beneath the announcement. Others responded with similar skepticism, with some questioning why taxpayer-supported institutions were hosting discussions framed around transgender menstruation.
Critics argue that events like this illustrate the gap between progressive activist circles and many ordinary voters. While most Americans have grown comfortable with the idea that gay and lesbian adults should be treated equally under the law, far fewer embrace progressive concepts on gender identity, biological sex, pregnancy and menstruation.
The controversy comes as Mayor Wu’s administration continues to navigate disputes around LGBTQ initiatives and funding. Earlier this year, Wu denied reports that city funds were being used to provide “wellness” benefits to LGBTQ migrants after an advocacy group publicly advertised such services. The group later revised its description of the program, and subsequently returned grant funding after disagreements emerged over how the money would be used.
The latest debate also highlights a broader national divide over language surrounding sex and gender. Critics argue that terms such as “trans menstruators” obscure biological realities while supporters contend that such language promotes inclusivity.
The event’s critics have also questioned whether public institutions should be hosting programs centered on niche, unpopular concepts that remain highly contested in the broader culture. Opponents argue that initiatives like “Trans Period Pride” risk alienating members of the public who recognize menstruation as an exclusively female biological function.
READ NEXT: Boston Mayor Consoles Family Of Alleged Attempted Murderer
Whaaaa?
Has this mayor lost her mind, or didn’t she have one to lose?