The Trump administration filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court, seeking to halt a lower court’s injunction that would require the White House to immediately resume payment of nearly $12 billion in foreign aid — bringing President Donald Trump’s foreign aid freeze back before the nation’s highest court for the second time in just six months.
At the center of the legal battle is funding allocated to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which was approved by Congress but suspended by President Trump in January as part of a broader executive order to slash foreign aid programs.
Trump’s order, signed early into his second term, effectively paused billions in grant payments under the banner of eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse. The administration has long argued that the U.S. taxpayer should not be footing the bill for overseas projects with limited accountability.
But judges continue to fight his decision.
Back-and-Forth in the Courts
Earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali in D.C. ruled that the Trump administration’s actions were unlawful, and ordered the government to begin disbursing the withheld aid funds. That decision was partially overturned this month by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, in a 2-1 ruling that sided with the Trump administration on several key arguments.
The appeals court found that foreign aid groups lacked standing to sue under the Impoundment Control Act (ICA), a 1974 law designed to prevent the executive branch from unilaterally withholding funds appropriated by Congress.
However, because the appeals court has not yet issued a formal mandate, Judge Ali’s injunction technically remains in effect — and with the federal fiscal year ending September 30, time is running out for the administration to delay payments.
That deadline triggered Tuesday night’s emergency appeal by Solicitor General D. John Sauer, who asked the justices to halt enforcement of the lower court’s order until the legal process plays out fully.
“Absent this Court’s intervention, the administration would be forced to rapidly obligate some $12 billion in foreign-aid funds within a matter of weeks — regardless of executive discretion or proper oversight,” Sauer wrote.
Legal Arguments: Separation of Powers and the Impoundment Act
Sauer argued that disputes over foreign aid spending fall squarely within the purview of the political branches, not private litigants. In his filing, he emphasized that Congress has not authorized third-party groups to sue over impoundment issues — and that allowing them to do so risks undermining the balance of powers laid out in the Constitution.
“Congress did not upset the delicate interbranch balance by allowing for unlimited, unconstrained private suits,” he wrote.
Foreign aid advocacy groups and their attorneys, however, say the Trump administration is violating both the Impoundment Control Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs executive rulemaking. They argue the White House is legally required to carry out the spending directives passed by Congress.
Protests and Political Fallout
The fight over USAID funding has sparked national protests and sharp partisan divides in Washington. Back in February and March, USAID employees and humanitarian groups staged rallies outside the agency’s D.C. headquarters and on Capitol Hill, demanding the administration reverse course.
A March 2025 meeting between USAID officials and Congress was met with demonstrators carrying signs reading “Aid Saves Lives” and “Keep Your Promises, Not Your Politics.”
Republicans have largely backed Trump’s foreign aid freeze, arguing that the U.S. has been overcommitted abroad while failing to invest at home. Democrats, meanwhile, accuse the Trump administration of weaponizing executive power to undermine congressional authority.
“What we are witnessing is a deliberate dismantling of America’s global leadership role — and a complete disregard for the rule of law,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT), a leading advocate for expansive foreign funding.
What Happens Next
The Supreme Court — which narrowly sided with the administration in a 5–4 decision earlier this year involving a related USAID freeze — has not yet indicated whether it will take up this latest appeal.
If the Court declines to act, the Trump administration may be forced to disburse the full $12 billion by September 30, even as it continues to fight the matter in court. If the justices agree to hear the case, they could temporarily pause the payments, pending final resolution.
Either way, the decision could carry major implications for executive power, congressional control of the federal purse, and the future of America’s role in international development and diplomacy.
READ NEXT: USAID Officer Pleads Guilty To Bribery Scheme
The corrupt Establishment Elite are HellBound on putting America last.
Of course much of the money finds it’s way into their pockets.
Make the money disappear by giving it back to the taxpayers! Guarantee that a majority of the population would have NEVER approved much of where this money was going int he first place. The executive branch has the authority to spend or not spend money where it is needed or not. If you do not want to give it to the taxpayers, then put it on the liberal national debt! The absolute majority of this money was on its way to other countries to pay for things that WE HAVE NO BUSINESS PAYING FOR!!! ANd it has been shown that a goodly portion was going to non profits that were in turn funneling it back to the US for political agendas through other non profits. STOP THE MADNESS! The judiciary has ZERO part of the money game!!!
When your wounded and bleading like hell, its not time to go to the blood bank and keep giving blood. Our politicians have been sticking knives in our backs trying to buy our friends for years. Those same friends took the opportunity to tell us that if we want them to continue to be our friends we need to pay them more. In the meant time, as an example with USAID, our polticians have been using NGO’s to launder the money and give kickbacks to our politicians, such as Nancy Pelosi getting $48 million for her private California vinyard to prove organic gardening, and similar projects. Elizabeth Warren, the fake indian heritage, got nearly 100 million plus her payoffs from big Pharma since she entered offic and now has a worth of over $860 Million, rides around in private jets, and owns way more than one home. Let Chuck Schumer expain is unexplainable wealth, and of course my favorite is Maxine Waters who’s only claim to fame is that she can screame Racism faster and louder than any one else in congress, got herself appointed the chairman of the banking committee and bailed her husbands bank out of failure all on our backs. Our current Congress is the most corrupt Congress in the History of the USA.