The Washington Post editorial board has called on the Trump administration to pursue “meaningful reform” of federal entitlement programs, particularly the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), following allegations of widespread fraud uncovered in Minnesota’s daycare system.
In an editorial published Wednesday, the Post said an investigation by independent journalist Nick Shirley helped bring national attention to what it described as Minnesota’s Somali fraud scandal. The board remarked that such scrutiny was long overdue, noting that “a spirit of scrupulousness would have been nice a few billion tax dollars ago.”
The editorial argued that the rapid expansion of the American welfare system—now encompassing more than 80 major federal programs—has made it vulnerable to abuse. Citing the Minnesota case, the board said the situation underscored the need for broader reforms nationwide and criticized progressive leaders for a reluctance to aggressively confront fraud.
According to the Post, this attitude is particularly evident in open-ended entitlement programs such as SNAP. The editorial noted that several Democratic-led states have sued to block the Trump administration’s efforts to combat waste and fraud by conditioning SNAP funding on states sharing recipient data, including immigration status. While the administration’s legal authority to cut off such funding is being disputed, the Post pointed out that blue states secured a preliminary injunction in October temporarily halting the policy.
“The truth is that SNAP doesn’t just help the hungry,” the editorial stated, adding that the program recorded the fourth-highest level of documented fraud among all federal programs between 2018 and 2022, totaling $10.5 billion.
Democratic officials have criticized the administration’s attempted crackdown. Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey argued that President Donald Trump was “playing politics with the ability of working parents with children, seniors and people with disabilities to get food.” The Post countered by citing Massachusetts’ own SNAP performance, noting a 14 percent payment error rate in fiscal year 2024—the seventh highest in the country—and adding that, nationwide, overpayments accounted for a larger share of errors than underpayments.
The editorial also referenced provisions in the tax bill passed in July requiring states with SNAP error rates above 6 percent to cover up to 15 percent of benefit costs beginning in 2028. A two-year buffer was included for states with high error rates to make improvements, a measure the board questioned, asking why the poorest-performing states should receive “special treatment.”
Responding to criticism that tougher oversight could leave Americans hungry, the Post argued that ensuring only eligible recipients receive benefits is not cruel, emphasizing that the goal of entitlement programs is to assist the truly vulnerable.
While the board said states must improve vetting of welfare beneficiaries, it cautioned the Trump administration against using fraud as a justification for broad funding cuts or for leveraging beneficiary data to support mass deportation efforts.
Following the viral spread of Shirley’s video alleging extensive fraud in Minnesota’s daycare system, the editorial noted that the administration froze all childcare payments to the state. The Post warned that eliminating or broadly suspending safety-net funding could harm legitimate recipients, not just fraudsters.
Instead, the editorial board recommended reforms such as block grants, arguing that fixed funding levels could encourage states to spend more responsibly and strengthen oversight.
“Social safety nets crumble when most taxpayers feel like welfare money goes to undeserving people,” the board concluded, adding that scrutinizing food stamp rolls is a necessary step toward preserving public trust while ensuring aid reaches those most in need.
READ NEXT: One Nation, One SNAP: Why Federalizing Food Assistance Is Long Overdue
WaPO seeded this years ago & IN on the scam