A Dutch immigration activist’s use of artificial intelligence to digitally reveal the identities of masked U.S. immigration officers has ignited a national controversy, thrusting AI surveillance and privacy concerns into the political spotlight.
Dominick Skinner, a European activist affiliated with a campaign known as the “ICE List,” claims to have successfully identified at least 20 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers by using AI facial recognition tools. According to Politico, Skinner’s team can digitally reconstruct a full identity from images or footage in which just 35% of an officer’s face is visible.
The technology, he says, is used to expose agents involved in immigration raids—especially those who wear masks to conceal their identities. While Skinner insists the ICE List only publishes officers’ names, critics say even limited exposure can put law enforcement lives at risk and lead to full-scale doxxing.
Lawmakers Respond: ‘Weaponizing AI Against Law Enforcement’
Lawmakers from both political parties have voiced concern, though their proposed solutions vary.
“ICE agents don’t deserve to be hunted online by activists using AI,” said Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), chair of the Senate Homeland Security subcommittee on border management. “This crosses every ethical and moral boundary.”
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), who leads the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on privacy and technology, warned that projects like Skinner’s reinforce the need for her bill — the Protecting Law Enforcement from Doxxing Act, introduced earlier this year. The legislation would criminalize the publication of a federal officer’s name if intended to interfere with law enforcement operations.
Meanwhile, Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI), co-sponsor of the VISIBLE Act — which advocates clearer visual identification of ICE agents — expressed caution over facial recognition’s reliability and misuse.
ICE, DHS Push Back: ‘This Threatens Lives’
ICE officials say the use of masks is for safety—not secrecy—and warn that Skinner’s AI-powered efforts are reckless.
“Campaigns like the ICE List threaten the lives of officers working in dangerous conditions,” said ICE spokesperson Tanya Roman.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) echoed this concern, accusing the ICE List of contributing to a rise in doxxing efforts aimed at federal employees.
Inside the AI ‘Unmasking’ Operation
Skinner has refused to disclose the specific AI model used but claims the system can reconstruct partial faces into full profiles, which are then cross-referenced with social media and public data.
While he admits the technology is imperfect — and misidentifications are possible — Skinner says the ICE List uses manual human verification before publishing names. The list, however, does not include home addresses, phone numbers, or direct personal data, which Skinner argues keeps it within legal and ethical boundaries.
“We’re not releasing anything that couldn’t be found on LinkedIn or a government transparency portal,” Skinner told a Dutch media outlet. “We are just making it visible.”
Privacy experts warn that even publishing a name alone can quickly lead to full personal data exposure, especially when paired with modern AI scraping tools.
Not the First Time: ICEBlock and the Digital War on Immigration Enforcement
This isn’t the first time left-wing activists have turned to tech to counter ICE.
As Breitbart News previously reported, a controversial app called ICEBlock allows users to crowdsource ICE raid locations in real time. With over 20,000 users, many of whom are in Los Angeles, the app functions like a neighborhood watch system — but for immigration agents.
“We’re literally watching history repeat itself,” said ICEBlock founder Aaron in a CNN interview, drawing controversial comparisons between U.S. immigration policy and Nazi-era Germany.
ICEBlock users can drop pins on a digital map marking sightings of federal agents, alerting nearby users to avoid those areas or document the interactions.
Legal but Concerning: A Privacy Vacuum in the Age of AI
Despite the outrage, legal experts say Skinner’s ICE List likely doesn’t violate current U.S. law. As long as no confidential information is disclosed and the content is based on publicly available images or data, it remains protected under free speech laws — however troubling that may be for law enforcement officials.
Many experts argue the real fix lies not in criminalizing such actions, but in comprehensive data privacy reform that would limit how much personal data is publicly accessible and how it can be used.
Whether Congress moves to criminalize this form of digital unmasking or to tighten data protections overall, the battle over the use of AI in law enforcement — by both sides — is just getting started.
READ NEXT: ICE Contracts Palantir For $30 Million Tracking AI
How loud does anyone think the doxxers would be screeching about their ‘rights’ if they were the ones getting doxxed? They can squawk all they want to that all they are trying to do is rein in out of control LE, especially ICE but they simply don’t care how many lives they put in jeopardy.
Indict and
TREATY OF EXTRADITION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS, SIGNED AT THE HAGUE ON JUNE 24, 1980.
Date Received from President
06/01/1981
Countries / Parties
Netherlands
Latest Senate Action
12/02/1981
Treaty approved by the Senate 96-0 vote (#438 Ex.).