In a bold move that has garnered attention from both political allies and critics, Representative Lauren Boebert (R-CO) has introduced new legislation aimed at abolishing the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). The bill, titled H.R. 129, comes at a time of shifting political power in Washington, D.C., as Republicans are poised to take control of the House, Senate, and the White House in coming weeks.
This latest push to dismantle the ATF is part of a broader trend among Republican lawmakers who have increasingly targeted the agency over the past few years, accusing it of overreach and violations of constitutional rights. Boebert’s bill highlights the growing tension between conservative lawmakers and federal agencies, especially in the wake of controversial rules implemented under the Biden administration.
One of the most contentious rules criminalized the ownership of AR-pistol stabilizer braces, which were previously considered legal accessories for firearms.
Another rule, which redefined 80% complete firearm frames as firearms, has drawn backlash from gun enthusiasts and manufacturers. Under the new regulation, such frames must be sold through licensed dealers and are subject to background checks—something critics argue is an attempt to circumvent Congress and impose more stringent controls on gun ownership without legislative approval.
Rep. Boebert’s call to abolish the agency follows a series of high-profile criticisms and legislative actions aimed at scaling back its power. In November 2024, Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) also called for the abolition of the ATF, describing the agency as “a disaster” and accusing it of undermining the Second Amendment. Burlison’s comments echoed the frustration of many Republicans who believe that the ATF’s actions have exceeded its mandate, particularly in relation to gun rights.
Following the resignation of Director Steven Dettelbach, the chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms Alan Gottlieb expressed relief, stating that it would remove a key figure from the administration’s gun control agenda. “That’s one less person Trump will have to fire after he takes office,” Gottlieb said, “and it is one less gun prohibition lobbyist on the government payroll.”
As Boebert’s bill moves through the legislative process, it is likely to face strong opposition from Democrats and gun control advocates, who argue that the ATF plays a vital role in maintaining public safety and preventing gun violence. However, with Republicans gaining momentum in the wake of the 2024 elections, Boebert’s proposal may serve as a rallying cry for those pushing for a smaller federal government and less bureaucratic interference.
President Trump has consistently signaled a strong interest in reducing the size and scope of the federal government, an agenda that aligns with Rep. Boebert’s push to abolish the ATF. With Trump preparing for a return to the White House in 2025, his administration is likely to support efforts like Boebert’s bill, viewing it as a critical step in fulfilling his promise to reduce the size of the federal government and limit its interference in Americans’ daily lives.
READ NEXT: What Should The Future Hold For The ATF?
Never in my life have I seen serious efforts to reduce the size and scope of government as we have witnessed recently. Go Lauren, may the Force be with you!