Denmark is preparing to ban the public broadcasting of the Islamic call to prayer, with the country’s immigration minister arguing the practice has no place over Danish neighborhoods.
Immigration Minister Morten Bødskov, a member of the center-left Social Democrats, confirmed he intends to pursue a nationwide ban on the public amplification of the adhan, the Islamic call to prayer traditionally recited five times each day.
“The call to prayer should not be heard over Danish rooftops. It has no place in Denmark, and you shouldn’t be in any doubt whether you’ve ended up in a suburb of Islamabad when you walk around Denmark,” Bødskov said.
The proposal marks the third time a Social Democratic government has sought to restrict the practice, following similar efforts in 2020 and 2025.
The adhan is already subject to local restrictions in parts of Denmark. Copenhagen, for example, limits amplified calls to prayer under municipal noise regulations.
A nationwide prohibition, however, could face legal challenges, though the measure would regulate public broadcasting of religious messages rather than private religious worship.
Danish law already permits certain restrictions on religious activities, including bans on anti-democratic preaching and limitations on foreign funding from prohibited organizations.
Other European countries have adopted similar approaches. Germany and the United Kingdom generally allow mosques to broadcast the call to prayer only during limited hours and under strict noise regulations designed to minimize disruptions to surrounding communities. France has also seen growing public debate over the practice in recent years.
The proposal has also revived discussion over the content of the adhan itself.
The BBC translates the Arabic phrase as: “God is great, there is no God but Allah. Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. Come to prayer.”
Some critics argue that translation softens the original wording. They contend that the opening phrase, “Allahu akbar,” is more accurately rendered as “God is greater,” emphasizing a comparative statement rather than simply declaring God’s greatness.
Others have argued that the public call to prayer differs fundamentally from the ringing of church bells because it contains an explicit declaration of Islamic belief.
Supporters of the Danish proposal argue that restricting amplified religious proclamations helps preserve public neutrality and respect the culture of a country where Christianity remains the historic majority faith. Opponents, meanwhile, are expected to argue that singling out the Islamic call to prayer could violate religious freedom protections.
If enacted, the measure would represent one of Denmark’s most significant efforts to limit the public expression of Islam as European governments continue grappling with questions surrounding immigration, integration and national identity.
READ NEXT: Aquinas, Islam, And Why Trump’s Immigration Reset Is Just
