President Donald Trump’s prime-time address on election security was reportedly scaled back after senior White House officials urged restraint, seeking to steer the president away from a more provocative presentation that acting Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte had advocated during internal discussions.
According to Politico, Pulte encouraged Trump in the days leading up to Thursday night’s speech to publicly identify intelligence officials he accused of concealing evidence of foreign election interference. The proposal reportedly alarmed senior aides, who feared naming the officials could put them at risk and overshadow the administration’s broader message on election security.
“Pulte got really scared by the whole thing and pulled back,” one administration official told Politico. The official said Pulte initially got Trump “all spun up” before concluding that publicly identifying the officials could have serious consequences. (RELATED: What The China Files Actually Reveal – And What They Don’t)
White House reportedly warned against naming officials
White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and other senior advisers reportedly warned Pulte that identifying intelligence personnel by name could encourage conspiracy theorists or political extremists to target them.
“He realized people could die with his reckless behavior,” one official told Politico.
The episode added to questions surrounding Pulte’s appointment as acting director of national intelligence. Before taking the role, the former private-equity executive and federal housing regulator had no professional background in intelligence, national security, or law enforcement.
Aides encouraged Trump to stick to prepared remarks
Even after Pulte reportedly abandoned the proposal, White House aides remained concerned that Trump might stray from his prepared remarks during the nationally televised address.
Officials reportedly advised the president that “the way to be taken seriously is not to be crazy,” urging him to keep the speech focused on arguments that the nation’s election system requires stronger safeguards. One administration official said earlier drafts contained “a lot of crazier” material.
Trump largely stuck to his prepared remarks, unveiling newly declassified material and arguing that the federal government had concealed serious vulnerabilities in the election system. However, independent analyses concluded the disclosures did not provide new evidence of widespread election fraud or manipulation.
Address revisited 2020 election
Despite the effort to narrow the speech’s focus, Trump again claimed the 2020 presidential election was stolen and suggested foreign actors had compromised electronic voting systems.
No evidence has emerged showing fraud on a scale sufficient to change the outcome of the 2020 election. Courts, state election officials, and members of Trump’s first administration either rejected or failed to substantiate those allegations following the election.
Republican election attorney Ben Ginsberg also said the newly released material did not demonstrate that any certified election result was incorrect.
Before the address, major television networks weighed whether to broadcast it live after Trump signaled he would revisit his claims about the 2020 election without specifying what he planned to present. (RELATED: Trump Calls For News Networks That Refused To Air Address To Have Broadcast Licenses Revoked)
Advisers divided over political strategy
Some administration officials reportedly believe Trump’s renewed emphasis on election integrity could energize Republican voters ahead of the midterm elections. Others worry the strategy could alienate swing voters who remain unconvinced by his longstanding claims about the 2020 election.
One Republican pollster described the speech as a strategic mistake, saying many independent voters were likely to respond with little more than an “eyeroll.”
Trump was reportedly pleased with the final address. Even so, some officials involved in preparing the speech remained uncertain whether it signaled the start of a sustained push on election issues or simply gave the president an opportunity to revisit long-held grievances.
READ NEXT: Trump Makes Huge And Emotional Endorsement
