The Department of Justice — now operating under the Trump administration — is managing to make the legal battle against Taylor Taranto even more absurd by the day.
At the heart of the controversy? A CZ Scorpion pistol with a brace — legally classified as a pistol by the ATF — but somehow being treated by federal prosecutors as both a short-barreled rifle (SBR) and an unlawful pistol.
This is the kind of government overreach that Second Amendment supporters have warned about for years — and it’s happening right now, despite President Trump’s clear pro-gun policies.
How Did We Get Here?
-In June 2023, Taranto was charged for possessing a CZ Scorpion with a pistol brace, accused of violating SBR regulations.
-Later, prosecutors added even more head-scratching charges — claiming the same gun is not only an SBR but also an “unlawful pistol.”
-This is despite the ATF’s own classification of the firearm as a pistol.
This legal contradiction isn’t just embarrassing — it’s dangerous precedent. Millions of law-abiding gun owners use pistol braces. If the DOJ gets its way, it could open the floodgates for prosecuting others over similar configurations.
Tom Knighton of Bearing Arms recently shared his disbelief:
How in the world can you make the case that he had an illegal pistol and had an illegal SBR for the same gun?
The kick in the butt is that I can see the legal distortions that will probably happen, arguing that because of nature of the firearm in question, it’s able to be Schrodinger’s firearm, where it’s a rifle sometimes and a pistol others, and it’s only defined when charges are applied.
This is insane, and I expected better out of the Trump administration.
No, I didn’t expect better out of Bondi, but I hoped her working for Trump rather than her own re-election would temper some of her anti-gun enthusiasm. So far, she’s done far better than I ever expected from her, but this is a stark reminder that we’ve got a long way to go. That she has a very long way to go.
Second Amendment Groups Are Sounding the Alarm
Gun rights advocates aren’t staying silent. Multiple Second Amendment groups have petitioned the DOJ, demanding the case be dropped and calling for accountability inside the department.
Is The DOJ Defying Trump’s Executive Orders?
That’s what has many conservatives, like Knighton, scratching their heads.
Back in February 2025, Trump signed an executive order halting Biden-era firearms regulations and ordering federal agencies to stop infringing on Second Amendment rights.
Yet here we are — with the DOJ still prosecuting a gun owner based on contradictory charges stemming from those same Biden-era policies.
Bureaucratic Resistance?
Some believe this case is a clear example of internal resistance within the DOJ — career bureaucrats ignoring the Trump administration’s pro-gun stance and continuing to push anti-gun prosecutions anyway.
In other words, this isn’t just about Taylor Taranto anymore.
It’s about whether unelected officials can undermine a sitting president’s policies — and whether millions of gun owners will face legal jeopardy for simply owning firearms that federal agencies have already deemed lawful.
Final Thoughts
If the DOJ doesn’t drop this case soon, it won’t just be a legal embarrassment — it will be a warning sign for every gun owner in America.
Surely the president understands this is exactly why conservatives fought to elect him — to stop this kind of bureaucratic overreach dead in its tracks.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: Maniac Arrested After Issuing Chilling Threats To MAGA Superstar & Family
Those commie anti gunners eat schitt!