ANALYSIS – Even doing a softball pre-recorded interview with Democrat-friendly Dana Bash on Democrat-friendly CNN, and toting along her Tim Waz emotional support animal, Kamala Harris still couldn’t pull off a successful presentation.
While the usual partisans only provided glowing evaluations of Harris’s performance, or vilified her, most saw her simply as the lightweight that she is.
A Daily Mail.com said “Kamala Harris looked ‘weak’ and ‘bad’ for waiting weeks and then sitting alongside her running mate rather than appearing solo in her first interview since becoming the Democratic nominee for president,” according to their panel of viewers.
According to the outlet, J.L. Partners asked a representative sample of viewers: “Kamala Harris did the interview with her running mate and has not sat for a solo interview since she has been named the nominee. How do you think this makes Kamala Harris look?”
“Unimpressed was the overall answer.”
James Johnson, co-founder of J.L. Partners added: “Voters split by party on their views of how Harris did, but they agree on one thing: Harris looked weak for not appearing solo.”
Meanwhile Just the News reported that according to body language experts: “Upon analyzing the interview, body language experts found that Harris was struggling to answer questions and sometimes appeared to be dishonest in her responses.”
Greg Hartley, a former interrogator in the U.S. Army, told Just the News: “She was “prepped a lot to not engage,” he added, and “run on not being Trump,” because otherwise, she had “no content.”
“She’s hollow,” Hartley said.
“If a person says one thing on Tuesday, another on Wednesday, then mentions their moral compass but doesn’t explain it or why they changed, you should question their sincerity,” he noted.
And, Just the News added:
Body language expert Susan Constantine told Fox News on Friday that Harris didn’t look confident during the interview.
“When I look at her overall demeanor, she does not carry the confidence or the presidential appearance in her demeanor to command in her position,” Constantine said. “So for everything that I saw last night, she definitely needs to make some tweaks into her body language to appear more confident.”
The outlet also noted:
“When she struggles, you start to see a lot of the head bobbling. You know, the head bobbling is ‘what part of the file in my subconscious am I going to pull out? Which ones are my answers?’” Constantine noted. “She couldn’t come up with a crystal-clear answer, and that’s why she tends to bobble.”
“When you bobble and waffle like that,” she continued, “that’s another signal that she’s not really… prepared. She doesn’t really have confidence in her own answers.”
So, some of the takeaways from the Harris-Walz softball interview are that Harris appeared weak, lacking in confidence, and was hollow and insincere. I would say that just about summarizes what I think of her, and her entire ersatz campaign.
I only hope we can see more of how Harris acts, and what she really is in the coming weeks.
READ NEXT: [WATCH] Kamala’s Bizarre Detroit Appearance Sparks WILD Accusations
”
“I only hope we can see more of how Harris acts, and what she really is in the coming weeks.”
We just did. Lies and waffling are all she has to cover up a really ugly character. This is a person whose integrity hangs like moss from a lamppost and points wherever she thinks the wind is blowing.