California’s long-troubled high-speed rail project is facing a fresh political revolt after several Central Valley mayors threatened legal action over a proposal that would divert local tax growth and zoning authority to help fund the massively over-budget rail system.
In a sharply worded April 23 letter to California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri, local leaders blasted the state’s proposal to “capture” future increases in property and sales tax revenues within a half-mile of planned rail stations.
Fresno Mayor Jerry Dyer, joined by leaders from Merced, Bakersfield, Hanford and Stockton, called the proposal a “legally dubious scheme” and warned it would unlawfully seize local taxpayer resources to prop up a state project that has struggled for years with delays, ballooning costs and political controversy.
The mayors also accused the state of setting “a dangerous statewide precedent” by attempting to redirect local revenue streams and potentially override local zoning authority near future stations.
Under the proposal outlined in the state’s delayed 2026 Draft Business Plan, California would not directly raise taxes. Instead, officials hope to redirect a portion of future growth in local property and sales tax revenue generated around high-speed rail stations. The plan would also expand state influence over development and zoning decisions in those areas.
Local officials argue the burden of funding the troubled rail line should not fall on cities and counties already struggling with housing, infrastructure and public safety costs.
“The responsibility for the troubled megaproject lies with the state, not with local taxpayers,” the mayors wrote.
County officials across California echoed those concerns in a separate letter arguing the proposal conflicts with multiple provisions of the California Constitution. The California State Association of Counties warned that local sales tax revenues are legally protected for local government purposes and cannot simply be redirected by the Legislature.
The High-Speed Rail Authority has not publicly responded to the criticism.
The backlash adds to growing scrutiny surrounding California’s high-speed rail system, which was originally pitched to voters in 2008 as a transformative transportation project connecting Los Angeles and San Francisco. At the time, the estimated cost was roughly $33 billion, with completion initially projected for 2020.
Now, nearly two decades later, the project’s estimated price tag has exploded to as much as $231 billion, according to a recent state analyst report, while no operational rail segment currently exists.
State auditors and fiscal watchdogs have repeatedly criticized the project’s management, transparency and funding assumptions. A Legislative Analyst’s Office report released last month warned the latest business plan contains “several issues,” including uncertain financing projections, reliance on future policy changes and an evolving project scope.
“In our view, the draft plan’s approach lacks transparency,” Legislative Analyst’s Office auditor Helen Kerstine told lawmakers during an April hearing.
Roughly $14 billion has already been spent, much of it on land acquisition, environmental work and partially completed infrastructure across the Central Valley. Critics have mocked some of the unfinished concrete structures rising from farmland as a modern-day “Stonehenge.”
The escalating fight also comes amid growing speculation about Gov. Gavin Newsom’s political future and his potential ambitions beyond Sacramento.
Though Newsom has repeatedly denied immediate presidential aspirations, he is widely viewed as a likely Democratic contender for the White House in 2028. Political observers have increasingly speculated that the governor is desperate to show visible progress on the high-speed rail project before a potential national campaign begins in earnest.
For years, the rail system has been one of California Democrats’ most ambitious — and politically damaging — infrastructure undertakings. Critics across the political spectrum have pointed to missed deadlines, exploding costs and scaled-back promises as evidence of government dysfunction.
Newsom has recently attempted to reframe the project as entering a new phase of momentum, celebrating the beginning of track-laying operations earlier this year and touting construction progress in the Central Valley. But opponents argue the governor is racing to salvage a politically viable version of the project after years of delays that have made the rail system a national symbol of government overreach and fiscal mismanagement.
Some critics believe the renewed push to secure local tax revenue and zoning control reflects mounting urgency inside the Newsom administration to complete enough visible infrastructure to claim success before the 2028 presidential cycle fully takes shape.
That political pressure may now collide directly with growing local resistance from California communities that increasingly view the project not as an economic opportunity, but as an expensive state burden being imposed on local taxpayers.
READ NEXT: Nicki Minaj Slams California Gov. Gavin Newsom
