Ruling Strikes Down Executive Attempt to Tighten Voter ID Rules
WASHINGTON — A federal judge has ruled that President Donald Trump’s executive order requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration cannot be enforced.
The decision, issued by Judge Colleen Kollar‑Kotelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, blocks the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) from amending the federal voter registration form to demand documents like birth certificates or passports.
Court Says Executive Power Has Limits
At the heart of the ruling is a separation of powers issue. The court found that the Constitution delegates authority over federal election procedures to Congress and the states — not the president acting alone.
This check on executive power reaffirms that the White House cannot unilaterally change national voter registration protocols, particularly those established under existing law.
Preserves Current Federal Registration Process
Under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, applicants registering with the federal form must attest to U.S. citizenship under penalty of perjury. Trump’s order would have added a requirement for documentary proof, a move critics said would impose unnecessary burdens and risk disenfranchising voters — especially those without easy access to passports or certified birth certificates.
The ruling grants partial summary judgment to plaintiffs, permanently barring the EAC from implementing the proof-of-citizenship requirement.
Not the End of the Legal Battle
In the wake of the ruling, the American Civil Liberties Union issued a sharply worded response underscoring what it saw as a victory for voters’ rights. “The court’s ruling confirms what we have long argued: the President may not rewrite election law to impose a burdensome show-your-papers rule that would shut out countless Americans from the ballot box.”
The group went on to frame the decision as a critical check on executive power. “This executive order was an attempted overreach of power, bypassing the Constitution’s clear allocation of authority to Congress and the states to set election rules,” the statement continued. “Our democracy is strongest when every eligible voter can register and vote free from expensive and unnecessary requirements.”
Although this provision is blocked, other elements of Trump’s executive order are still in legal limbo. Pending challenges include rules around mail-in ballots, interstate data sharing, and funding threats to states.
As The Hill notes, the administration is not prepared to accept defeat. Officials announced plans to appeal Judge Kollar-Kotelly’s ruling:
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told The New York Times that the administration will appeal the ruling.
“President Trump has exercised his lawful authority to ensure only American citizens are casting ballots in American elections,” she said.
Trump signed the executive order in March. Though the order says state governments oversee American elections, “the United States has not adequately enforced Federal election requirements that, for example, prohibit States from counting ballots received after Election Day or prohibit non-citizens from registering to vote.”
What This Means for Voters
For now, eligible voters using the federal registration form will not face new documentation hurdles. States may still impose additional requirements under their own laws, but they cannot enforce Trump’s attempted federal change through the EAC.
The ruling maintains the status quo and keeps voter registration rules unchanged at the federal level. However, broader debates over election access and voter fraud are far from settled.
READ NEXT: Dems Move To Undercut Trump’s National Security Edge
Defy this Supremeless Judicial Joker!