One of the women at the center of a bombshell New York Times report on Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner is now publicly accusing the newspaper of betraying her trust and watering down allegations she says were supported by multiple sources.
Lyndsey Fifield, a former girlfriend of Platner whose allegations featured prominently in the Times investigation published this week, issued a lengthy statement Friday claiming editors stripped critical information from the final story and excluded some of the most serious accusations gathered during the reporting process.
“It dawned on me that this really was a set up all along,” Fifield wrote. “The journalists I trusted who convinced me to share a story I never wanted to tell methodically delayed and twisted this into a gift to the Platner campaign.”
Accuser Says Key Details Were Removed
According to Fifield, reporters spent months collecting documents, interviewing witnesses, and seeking corroboration before publishing the story. She said she initially believed the process was thorough and fair.
After publication, however, she concluded that editors had removed substantial portions of the reporting.
Among her complaints, Fifield alleges the newspaper omitted allegations from multiple women and failed to include information she says corroborated her claims about Platner’s behavior years before he entered politics.
“The Times also failed to include any mention that I did confide in multiple friends through the years that Graham had been abusive,” Fifield wrote, adding that those friends later confirmed their accounts to reporters.
The New York Times had not publicly responded to her criticism.
What Was Reported
The original report drew on interviews with more than two dozen people and examined Platner’s personal conduct, relationships, and behavior over several years.
Several former romantic partners described him as volatile, misogynistic, or unsettling, while others offered more favorable accounts.
Fifield, who dated Platner from roughly 2013 to 2015, alleged that he could become physically rough during arguments and described incidents in which he allegedly grabbed her, pulled her from a taxi, and restrained her during a confrontation.
The newspaper noted that Platner strongly disputed those allegations and said it could not independently corroborate several of the specific incidents.
Fifield also alleged that Platner referred to a controversial chest tattoo as “my Totenkopf” and made disturbing comments during conversations about violence and dominance.
The Times identified Fifield as a Virginia conservative who has worked with Republican campaigns and organizations, a fact later cited by Platner’s campaign in challenging her credibility.
Platner Rejects Abuse Claims
Platner has categorically denied allegations that he physically abused Fifield.
During an interview Thursday evening, the Democratic Senate candidate called the accusations “not true” and rejected claims that he had physically harmed his former girlfriend.
He has also argued that many of the allegations surfacing during the campaign are politically motivated.
Platner has separately acknowledged reports that he exchanged sexually explicit messages with multiple women while married. He and his wife, Amy Gertner, have said they addressed those issues through counseling before the campaign began.
Campaign Faces New Questions
The dispute comes just days before Maine Democrats select their nominee in one of the nation’s most closely watched Senate races.
Platner remains the presumptive Democratic nominee seeking to challenge incumbent Sen. Susan Collins in November. Democrats view the seat as one of their best pickup opportunities in the fight for Senate control.
What began as a damaging report about Platner’s personal conduct has now evolved into a public dispute between one of his accusers and one of the country’s most influential newspapers.
Whether Fifield’s allegations about the reporting process gain traction remains unclear, but her statement has added another unexpected twist to a campaign already defined by controversy.
READ NEXT: Entire Navy Command Team Removed From Critical Overseas Post
