Like all famous politicians, Nikki Haley has a healthy dose of ambition. In an interview with Fox News host Bret Baier, she made it abundantly clear her aspirations haven't wilted after leaving the Trump administration.
The former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and South Carolina's first female governor said she's seriously considering a run for the White House in 2024.
“We need to go in a new direction,” Haley told Baier before adding, “I've never lost a race.”
Haley didn't formally announce a presidential campaign but strongly hinted at the prospect, as The Hill reports:
“If I run, I'm running against Joe Biden. That's what I'm focused on, because we can't have a second term of Joe Biden,” Haley said in an interview aired Thursday on Fox News's “Special Report.”
…
Haley had previously said she wouldn't run against Trump, but appeared to suggest in the Fox News interview that she'd changed her mind on the matter.
“I had a great working relationship with the [former] president. I appreciate all the foreign policy issues we worked on together. But what I will tell you is: the survival of America matters. And it's bigger than one person. And when you are looking at the future of America, I think it's time for new generational change,” Haley said.
She repeated calls for a “young generation” of Washington leaders to surge into the capital.
Observers expect Biden, 80, to announce his reelection campaign soon. Trump, 76, launched his White House bid in November.
READ NEXT: New Move Rocks George Floyd Case >>
I would consider Haley if she ran but only if Mike Pence wasn’t running too.
Nikki was never a Trump ally. She has always been a backstabber.
“Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able MEN, such as fear God, MEN of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers….” (Exodus 18:21)
“As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.” (Isaiah 3:12)
“But I suffer not a woman to … to usurp authority over the man….” (1 Timothy 2:12)
This is not to say that the men in positions of civil leadership are any more biblically qualified than are today’s women – they’re not.
You can thank Article 6’s Christian test ban (by which mandatory biblical qualifications were likewise eliminated) on both counts.
For more regarding Article 6’s Christian test ban, see Chapter 9 “Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at Bible versus Constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Book page and scroll down to Chapter 9.
Then Chapter 28 “Amendment 19: The Curse of Women’s Suffrage.”