Gov. Glenn Youngkin isn’t the most outspoken of governors. He just quietly does what he does in Virginia, even with a hostile legislature that seems determined to make the Old Dominion State one of the most anti-gun in the nation.
In fact, they sent a pile of gun control bills to him, which would be bad news for Virginia residents like our dear, old Cam Edwards.
But, well, it seems that he wasn’t interested in playing along.
Northern Virginia legislators are decrying Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s recent veto of a bill to keep firearms from the homes of domestic abusers.
Youngkin vetoed 157 bills on Monday (March 24), including Sen. Barbara Favola’s (D-40) Senate Bill 744 and Del. Elizabeth Bennett-Parker’s House Bill 1960 — identical pieces of legislation that amend existing Virginia law by removing firearms from the hands of convicted domestic abusers.
“Guns and domestic violence are a lethal combination and these deaths are preventable,” Bennett-Parker said in a statement. “These bills were a common-sense fix to ensure that illegal guns stay out of the hands of convicted domestic abusers. I’m incredibly frustrated that the Governor vetoed our ability to protect women who are dying at the hands of their abusers through better enforcement of our existing laws. The Governor has made Virginia less safe for women and families.”
Youngkin has vetoed the measure for the second year in a row, and Bennett-Parker and Favola’s statements mirror their reactions to last year’s veto.
They should get used to disappointment.
However, this wasn’t the only anti-gun bill in and amongst those 157 items. Neary two dozen more got the veto treatment, according to a press release from the NRA:
Yesterday, Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin reaffirmed his support for the rights of law-abiding gun owners by vetoing two dozen bills that would have trampled on the Second Amendment freedoms of the citizens of the Commonwealth. Similar to last session, Governor Youngkin disposed of egregious legislation that would have emboldened criminals and left peaceable Virginians defenseless.
“On behalf of Virginia’s NRA members and Second Amendment supporters, I want to thank Governor Youngkin for standing strong in his support for the Second Amendment by vetoing the litany of gun control bills pushed through the General Assembly this year,” said John Commerford, Executive Director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA). “For the second year in a row, gun control activists tried to enact dozens of radical, California-style laws that would have severely restricted the Second Amendment rights of gun owners in the Commonwealth. The NRA applauds Governor Youngkin for upholding his promise to protect our Constitutional freedoms.”
The bills vetoed by Governor Youngkin came from the long wish list of radical gun control activists. This included attempts to restrict the Constitutional rights of 18- to 20-year-old adults, dramatically expand gun-free zones that would have left law-abiding Virginians defenseless and enact a mandatory waiting period to take possession of a legally purchased firearm. In addition, the vetoed legislation would have banned a wide range of commonly owned firearms used by Virginians to hunt, compete and for self-defense.
That’s the good news.
The bad news is that Virginia has off-year elections. In fact, they go to the polls this fall to elect a new governor and vote on the legislature, among other offices. Youngkin can’t run for re-election because Virginia has a law where governors can’t serve consecutive terms.
And based on the 2024 election, where Kamala Harris took the state by over five points, it doesn’t look like a red wave is likely this year.
But much of the anti-gun lean in the state comes from Northern Virginia, where many federal bureaucracy employees live. Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you know what DOGE is doing to the bureaucracy.
That might have some kind of impact on the election outcome, as many now unemployed federal workers may be relocating to less expensive communities throughout the nation.
Or, at a minimum, someplace where they can get a job.
However, gun rights proponents in the state should probably not count on that and mobilize now, back candidate who will support their gun rights, and do everything the can to mitigate the impact anti-gun groups will have on the upcoming election.
Find this article on Bearing Arms.
This article originally appeared on Bearing Arms. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News. It is republished with permission.
Domestic Violence & Guns DONT Mix can be BAD for Both sides (minus cops present)
I am 80 years old served 8 years (Sept. 1962 to Sept 1970) in the Military, in Armor, Recon, and Artillery, during the Vietnam war. I learned how to shoot at 7 years old, in eliminating Jack Rabbits investing our hay fields in Utah. Protection is everyone right. even if it is against wild jack rabbits investing your hay, grain, corn and barley fields. Jack Rabbits have a right to live also, but in their area of the forest. I fear for a country who eliminates gun rights or any right of defense Is taking away a peoples rights to defend themselfs. Eliminate gun rights, then the innocent will have no protection and bad people, like the Jack Rabbits will have all the guns, because they like the jack rabbits will have no fear in continuing to rob, steal, & kill. You will never create a law that will eliminate bad guys from having guns because they do not respect law they will continue to invade and rob people. But if good people have guns the invaders will be less likely to attack good people if hey know they are also carrying. We have seen this with our own country, and other countries in the NUCLEAR race.