Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, recently introduced the “Abolish TSA Act of 2025,” a proposal to dismantle the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and shift airport security responsibilities to private companies. The TSA, which was established in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, has long been a fixture of U.S. airport security. Lee’s bill, however, has already drawn sharp criticism and mockery, especially from House Democrats, who ridiculed the proposal in stark terms.
Lee has been a long-time critic of the TSA, arguing that it has become an inefficient and intrusive government agency. In a recent post on X (formerly Twitter), Lee asked, “Who supports my bill to abolish TSA?” His call for support was met with mockery from Democratic lawmakers.
Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla., responded with a sarcastic remark, saying, “Bin Laden,” while Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., added, “The Ayatollah, probably.” These comments were a clear attempt to associate Lee’s proposal with figures who have been enemies of the U.S., suggesting that such a move could benefit those with hostile intentions toward the country.
The TSA was created by Congress in response to the 9/11 attacks, with the goal of preventing similar tragedies by providing heightened security at airports. However, critics, including Lee, argue that the agency has failed in its mission, pointing to repeated shortcomings in its ability to detect weapons and explosives during security screenings. Lee’s bill asserts that the TSA’s vast bureaucratic structure is ineffective and should be replaced.
“The TSA has not only intruded into the privacy and personal space of most Americans, it has also repeatedly failed tests to find weapons and explosives,” Lee said in a statement. “Our bill privatizes security functions at American airports under the eye of an Office of Aviation Security Oversight, bringing this bureaucratic behemoth to a welcome end.”
The idea is to replace federal employees with private contractors who would handle airport security under strict oversight from what would be the new Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) office. Lee argues that this approach would provide more efficient and customer-friendly security screenings while still maintaining safety.
Democrats have also been criticized for misrepresenting the intent of the bill, equating the abolition of the TSA with the abolition of airport security altogether. Rather than addressing the specifics of the proposal, which seeks to privatize security functions under strict federal oversight, many Democrats have resorted to alarmism and hyperbole. This argument seems to suggest that security measures can only be effectively carried out by government employees, overlooking the possibility that private companies, regulated by the government, could provide similar, if not more efficient, security services.
READ NEXT: Decades After 9/11, TSA Continues to Embody Negligence
Seijah Drake was born in Boston, MA, where she developed a penchant for writing early on and a passion for politics in college. After college she worked briefly for a conservative media in New York before relocating to the Greater D.C. Area to pursue a career in political marketing. She now resides in the free state of Florida.
