The Senate’s Confirmation Process Is a National Disgrace
The United States Senate was once hailed as the “world’s greatest deliberative body.” It was a chamber of statesmen, a forum where decorum and debate reigned supreme, and where a president’s nominees were judged not by partisan allegiance but by character and competence. That noble ideal died long ago. The confirmation hearing of Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence (DNI) under President Trump was just the latest evidence that the process has devolved into an unrestrained spectacle of political theater, where nominees are not vetted but publicly humiliated.
Thursday’s hearing was disgraceful. It was not an exercise in “advise and consent.” It was an ambush. Democrat senators, armed with selectively edited quotes and prepackaged smears, didn’t seek to assess Gabbard’s qualifications or her vision for the role. Instead, they barraged her with gotcha questions, interrupted her attempts to respond and twisted her words in real-time. The objective was never to deliberate. It was to embarrass her on national television, to stage a spectacle for their base and their media allies. And in this pursuit, they made it abundantly clear: The Senate’s confirmation process is irreparably broken.
The Lost Tradition of Deliberation
The Constitution grants the Senate the power of “advise and consent” to ensure that presidential appointments meet a basic standard of competency and ethical fitness. The Founders, ever wary of unchecked executive power, designed this process as a check against cronyism. They did not, however, intend for the Senate to function as an obstructionist body that rejects qualified nominees solely based on partisan animus.
In the early days of the Republic, confirmation hearings were private affairs. Senators genuinely sought to understand a nominee’s character, asking probing but respectful questions. The process was swift—George Washington’s nominees were often confirmed in a single day. Even controversial picks, like John Marshall for Chief Justice in 1801, were debated earnestly rather than subjected to personal destruction.
That began to change in the late 19th century, when the Senate grew more partisan. By the mid-20th century, confirmation hearings for Supreme Court justices became political battlegrounds, with ideology taking precedence over qualification. The modern era, beginning with the destruction of Robert Bork in 1987, has cemented a new standard: If the opposing party controls the Senate, expect a brutal and disingenuous inquisition.
Tulsi Gabbard: A Case Study in Senate Dysfunction
Tulsi Gabbard’s hearing was a textbook example of how the Senate has abandoned its duty. A former Democratic congresswoman who became a political independent, Gabbard is no stranger to standing up to her former party’s orthodoxy. But her apostasy was precisely what made her a target.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse demanded that she answer for statements she never made, cutting her off whenever she attempted to clarify. Senator Richard Blumenthal repeated falsehoods about her past remarks, only to ignore her when she offered a direct rebuttal. Senator Mazie Hirono, in her usual performative outrage, lectured her on supposed disqualifications that she conveniently ignored when Democratic presidents nominated radical leftist activists to key intelligence positions.
What was clear from the start was that the decision had already been made. These senators were not there to advise. They were there to obstruct. The hearing was a performance for the cameras, not an attempt to assess whether Gabbard was fit to serve as the nation’s top intelligence official.
Two Solutions: Restore Decorum or Drop the Pretense
If the Senate is to reclaim its dignity, it must either restore the traditional norms of confirmation hearings or fully embrace the reality of the partisan battlefield and level the playing field.
One possible solution is to return to private deliberations. Nominees could be vetted behind closed doors, where grandstanding is impossible and the focus remains on qualifications rather than political spectacle. The British Parliament handles appointments in a far less sensationalist manner, and the Republic would be better for following suit.
If public hearings must remain, rules should be reformed to ensure fairness. Senators should be required to allow nominees a reasonable amount of time to respond before they are interrupted. False claims should be struck from the record. Most importantly, senators who demonstrate clear bad faith should be sanctioned.
Alternatively, if decorum is gone for good, nominees should be allowed to fight back. If senators are permitted to interrupt nominees at will, nominees should be granted the same right to interrupt misleading or bad-faith questioning. If a senator distorts a nominee’s record, the nominee should be free to ridicule their ignorance in real-time. If the confirmation process is to be a cage match, then at least let both sides throw punches.
Better yet, eliminate the entire charade and require an up-or-down vote within a set timeframe. Let the president have his Cabinet. If the Senate cannot prove that a nominee is unqualified, corrupt or a legitimate national security risk, then the default should be confirmation. The current system exists solely to provide senators with more time to grandstand for television, not to ensure good governance.
A Nation That Looks Like a Joke
What happened to Gabbard is not new. The same disgraceful treatment was inflicted upon Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in his congressional hearing. Each time, the country is subjected to the same embarrassing circus, and each time the process erodes further.
The Senate should be the world’s greatest deliberative body. Instead, it resembles the Roman Colosseum, where political opponents are dragged in for public execution while the mob—whether on Capitol Hill or in the corporate media—cheers for blood.
If the Senate cannot behave like adults, then it is time to strip them of the ability to play these cynical games. History offers us examples of grandstanding backfiring spectacularly. The 1991 Clarence Thomas hearings, for instance, saw public sympathy shift in his favor as Americans recoiled at the blatant spectacle. Similarly, the failed smear campaign against Robert Bork in 1987 led to a backlash that forever changed how nominees prepare for Senate inquests. When the Senate abandons fairness, the American people notice—and they remember. The American people deserve a government that is serious. What they witnessed yesterday was anything but.
Sponsored by the John Milton Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to helping independent journalists overcome formidable challenges in today’s media landscape and bring crucial stories to you.
READ NEXT: Senator’s Chilling Attacks On Supreme Court Under Law Enforcement Spotlight
The Framer’s vision was to create two deliberative bodies. House members are chosen by the people in a popular vote. The Senate was meant to be representative of State Legislatures, where Senators are NOT chosen by the people directly, but by the people’s state representatives.
When the Senate was changed to a popular vote (just like the house), the states lost their ability to participate in federal affairs!
The original system of choosing Senators should be returned! States SHOULD have federal representation!
Let’s restore our trust in the Founder’s vision! Let’s return to that system of balance between the two houses!
Senators should not be selected by a popularity contest!
The push-back will be severe! Look at all the money made in Senate races! The media, pollsters, printers, speech writers and political consultants will lose tons of money…but, Americans will benefit by the restoration of government as it was intended.
We are the United STATES…not a federal Leviathan.
I have to agree 100% on this point. Are they adults or are they little brats?
What passes as a confirmation hearing isa travesty. There is no excuse for adults yelling insults rather than attempting to determine qualifications. The same democrats engaged in this juvenile taunting are those who gushed over completely unqualified Biden selections chosen only to check a box rather than determine qualifications.
Too bad these idiots in Congress are not subject to the same type of hearing in front of a select group from each party. Some times the questions asked have nothing to do with the person’s qualifications or how they plan to do the job … they are merely trying to smear the person’s name. These “hearings” are pure and simple an opportunity for those clowns to “grandstand”. Actually we should be thankful we have people willing to put up with these “hearings”.
It is not surprise, they are very, very poor loser and, they are out for blood, WE HAD BETTER HOPE AND PRAY THAT ANOTHER TRUMP GETS THE NEXT PRESIDENCY, OTHERWISE, ALL REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES WILL BE LINED UP AGAINST A WALL, AND SHOT.
Limit the questions to 20 words, three questions per senator, no interruptions. Having watched these things now and in the past, each question is a speech with the hint of a question at the end
Lady you stood tough. Those bureaucratic hacks if they had to go through the demeaning and grading process would turn into puddles crying how infare and insulting they were treated. The congressmen were not professional. They are temper tantrum crying spoiled brats. They need to be unelected and have lessons in manners.
The country needs to have statesmen, who put the welfare of the country first. These politicians put their selfish wants above the good of the country. This will destroy the country the founding fathers fought for.
Change Nomination system:
On Merit
Examine resume
Past positions
Then vote
It is truly a shame that President Trump’s nominees have to listen to and be subjected to such crap from the democrats. I pray that republicans are much smarter. I also pray that she will prevail and be confirmed.
what is wrong with the democrats? people are really getting fed up with their hate
I say again, we have no statesmen in the Democrat party.Truman and Kennedy would be ashamed.
Yes, our entire government is a fricking joke anymore. The Deocrats have destroyed any dignity that use to be left in this goverment with their total BS in every area you can think of. We let Leaders of the House and the Senate to gain astrnomical wealth from very dubious actions and ever question them about it. We allow cheats and liars to become Senators, and in some cases they comitted purgery against a POTUS which is treason. What is wrong with this voting nation? We lost the ideals of even JFK when he said “Ask not what your country can do for you, as what you can do for your country” Instead we have LBJ who, as a racist, came up with the ” Great Society” which he basically said if you cannot take care of yourself, your govement will take care of you. That government has no money, it gets money from the tax payers who now must pay the welfares of people and the bill is more than the current National Defense Budget! Go figure. In the house and the senate the cameras should only record for record and not be broadcast out to the public, all that does is give idiots a chance to grand stand and put on a show. We need to stop this tomfoolery. The best way to do it is at the ballot box and start changing out some of these Career Poltiicians who contunue to ensite total BS. We also need to deman that the Term Limits legislation that Chuch Schumer pigeon holed be brought back out and passed forward for vote BY THE PEOPLE.
I think the process was derailed with the 17th amendment to the constitution. The senate was previously elected by the legislatures of the individual states but the 17th amendment changed it to popular election. This amendment made the senate more political. Senators are supposed to represents their respective states but are now a six year version of a congressman. Repeal the 17th amendment and, I believe, the senate will right itself. A big advantage is there will be no need for senators to seek money to support their election and, in the process, deep six big money doners and the senators ability to think independently of said doners.
There is no doubt that the partisan detractors at the very least are breaking the 9th Commandment; “Thou shalt not bear false witness against your neighbor.” We already know that Adam, not to be mistaken for the very first Adam, is no doubt stemming from the first accusation trial, is a proven liar. Schiff, vehemently stated he had evidence as well as a whistleblower witness, but could never produce either one. We can only wonder if Putin was elated by the very mention of Russian interference with Trump’s first election, or incensed for being accused of the same. Perhaps Putin shrugged it off as “stupid American politics?”