CCP-Linked Activists Fight Bills To Curb Access To Military & Education

A Chinese-American organizational network is under scrutiny after organizing opposition to state-level national security legislation in the Midwest, according to a recent investigation by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The reporting focuses on the role of United Chinese Americans (UCA), a nonprofit based in Washington, D.C., and its regional affiliates, which have mobilized activists to protest security bills in states such as Ohio and Iowa.

Protests Target State Legislation

In Ohio, activists gathered at a March 17 statehouse hearing to oppose House Bill 1, a proposal that would restrict individuals from designated “foreign adversary” nations from purchasing land near military bases and critical infrastructure.

Days later, similar organizing efforts took place in Iowa, where demonstrators protested House File 2513, which would limit public universities from hiring certain visa holders from countries classified as foreign adversaries.

Opponents of the legislation argue that the measures are discriminatory and could harm economic growth, academic collaboration, and civil liberties. Protesters framed their efforts as defending immigrant communities and opposing what they describe as “overly broad restrictions.”

Allegations of Government Links

The controversy stems from claims that some individuals associated with UCA and related groups have past or indirect ties to the Chinese government, including connections to the United Front Work Department (UFWD), an entity often cited by American officials as part of China’s overseas influence operations.

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission has previously warned that the UFWD seeks to expand influence abroad by engaging diaspora communities and shaping political narratives.

Some critics, including policy advocates and national security analysts, argue that such connections raise concerns about foreign influence in state-level policymaking.

Leaders of United Chinese Americans have denied these claims. UCA president Haipei Shue acknowledged that some members may have previously worked in China’s government but denied that the organization operates on behalf of or in coordination with Beijing.

Policy Debate Intensifies

The bills at the center of the controversy reflect a growing trend among American states to address national security risks tied to foreign ownership of land and participation in sensitive sectors.

States including Florida and Missouri have passed or considered similar measures restricting property ownership near military installations. Proponents argue these laws are necessary safeguards against espionage and infrastructure vulnerabilities.

Broader Implications

The dispute highlights the intersection of national security concerns, immigration policy, and institutional safeguards.

As legislation continues to move forward in multiple states, debates over these issues are likely to intensify—particularly as tensions between the United States and China remain a central factor in domestic and foreign policy discussions.

READ NEXT: Islamist Jihadists Signal New Target: China