Laura Loomer, whose courage and relentless pursuit of truth have repeatedly exposed left-wing hypocrisies, deserves commendation and respect. Her frustration regarding the delayed Epstein files is both justified and widely shared among conservatives. However, expecting Attorney General Pam Bondi to commandeer the entire DOJ, FBI and the notoriously independent SDNY mere weeks into her tenure is akin to asking George Washington to take Britain in a fortnight—patriotic zeal, perhaps, but decidedly unrealistic.
First, let us address Loomer’s core accusation—that Bondi’s previous lobbying work for Qatar somehow disqualifies her from serving honorably. Loomer presents Bondi’s tenure at Ballard Partners and their sizable retainer from Qatar as though uncovering hidden British spies at Valley Forge. Yet this “bombshell revelation” isn’t explosive, nor remotely new. Anna Massoglia, editor-in-chief of Influence Brief, meticulously detailed Ballard Partners’ lobbying arrangements with Qatar through publicly accessible Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) filings back on July 29, 2019. These filings were openly available to anyone with the inclination to research—a fundamental transparency mechanism intended precisely to dispel suspicion. Further, Senator Dick Durbin explicitly raised Bondi’s Qatar engagement during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on January 15, 2025, questioning why Bondi had omitted the Qatar association from her initial disclosures. Bondi’s straightforward response—that her role centered exclusively on anti-trafficking efforts and that she was prepared to recuse herself if necessary—was publicly debated and ultimately deemed sufficient by Republicans, with even Democrats conceding the point. Resurrecting this issue now, fully aired and rigorously examined years prior, strikes one as not only tardy but intellectually dishonest.
New FARA disclosures from big Trump fundraiser Brian Ballard's lobbying firm add former Florida AG Pam Bondi as a foreign agent for Qatar "in matters related to combating human trafficking" with a $115,000-per-month consulting fee https://t.co/N3JE10tIji https://t.co/ioEkhi5vPs pic.twitter.com/lOkrPoluzR
— Anna Massoglia (@annalecta) July 25, 2019
Moreover, Bondi’s precise role was not to strengthen tyrannical regimes or undermine American interests, but specifically to advise on combatting human trafficking—an effort conservatives traditionally praise rather than punish. Suggesting Bondi individually pocketed $115,000 monthly overlooks the operational reality of large lobbying firms: fees paid to Ballard Partners covered collective expertise and resources, not lining Bondi’s pockets alone. Misrepresenting these details only dilutes credibility.
On to the heart of Loomer’s grievance—the slow and partial release of the Epstein files. Loomer’s impatience, shared by many rightly incensed citizens, is justified. The sluggish wheels of bureaucratic justice grate on the American temperament, accustomed to rapid accountability. Yet to demand Bondi exert complete control over entities known for their entrenched resistance to oversight, particularly the SDNY—infamous for its political labyrinths—betrays a misunderstanding of federal institutional power dynamics. Bondi, barely weeks into office, is neither sorceress nor dictator, and to expect immediate total transparency borders on magical thinking.
Historical analogies abound, cautioning against such rashness. Jefferson, a champion of transparency, did not overturn the entrenched Federalist apparatus overnight. Reagan, in the early 1980s, grappled tirelessly against bureaucratic inertia, understanding that institutions, for good or ill, resist sudden change. It is neither conservative nor realistic to fault Bondi for failing to instantly overhaul entrenched establishments like the FBI, DOJ and SDNY.
Furthermore, Loomer’s accusations overlook critical geopolitical realities. Qatar, despite flaws, remains an ally, crucial in American strategic positioning in the Middle East—hosting one of our largest overseas military installations. American foreign policy has long been guided by pragmatic alliances, not ideological purity tests. Bondi’s past engagement with Qatar—far from being sinister—was aligned with a broadly accepted conservative foreign policy approach rooted in Reaganite realism.
To assail Bondi now, rather than allowing her time to navigate the treacherous bureaucratic waters toward greater accountability, plays directly into the left’s narrative: sowing division where unity should prevail, particularly as conservatives confront real threats from woke bureaucracies, DEI mandates, and progressive judicial activism. Loomer’s energy, though commendable when rightly directed, might be better served targeting genuine adversaries rather than launching premature volleys against strategic allies.
Pam Bondi, a competent and proven conservative leader, deserves scrutiny, certainly—but scrutiny grounded in truth and measured expectation. Conservatives rightfully frustrated by delays and obfuscation in the Epstein files saga must aim their ire at entrenched bureaucracies, not prematurely scapegoat allies navigating complex power dynamics. Loomer’s passionate patriotism is commendable; her current trajectory, however, resembles an errant stormtrooper—bravely charging but missing the mark entirely.
Sponsored by the John Milton Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to helping independent journalists overcome formidable challenges in today’s media landscape and bring crucial stories to you.
READ NEXT: Progressive Lawmaker Has A Painfully Ironic Accusation For Trump’s DOJ
NO ONE WHO HAS COMMITED A CRIME ON PAPER CAN BE PARDONED BY A PESIDENTIAL PARDON, SO KNOWING THIS LEAVES A LOT OF ROOM TO GO AFTER THE PEOPLE WHO ARE CRIMINALS LIKE ADAM SCHIFF AND MANY OTHERS
I don’t disagree with you at all, but (I hate it when people say “but,” but it’s appropriate here) with everything else going on, this subject needs to be raised again and again and again until it’s answered, because otherwise it’s likely to get buried in all the other news. I totally get, though, that AG Bondi is not a miracle worker and there’s a lot for her to do. I just hope she gets the support she needs to do it.
TEN – I also “don’t disagree with you” but I have to point out that she has only had a few weeks to try to counter years of epstein defenders digging in and fighting tooth and nail to protect all of the guilty parties that should be outed by a total release of all of the records. I’m willing to give her a reasonable time span to sort thru all of the obstacles.
No it is not out of the question to release these documents immediately if she can’t do the job get rid of her, we are Not Stupid she is protecting someone or even more get rid of her Immediately don’t trust this person at all sorry I don’t believe women should be in such important truth telling jobs, don’t like her condensation attitude as she is boss she is not Trump is and he knows all records are to be released immediately
Americans (mainly the Conservative Voters): Hello. So what are the expectations and eagerness for scandals revealed about Epstein associations documented which may border on lack of integrity and propriety pushing legality? “Who will be indicted for what” seems the anticipations or speculations? No good or benefit knowing the “dirt on whom”…TBD.