Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin signaled a potential escalation in the federal government’s approach to sanctuary cities, suggesting that jurisdictions refusing to cooperate with immigration enforcement could face significant consequences—including limits tied to international air travel.
Speaking on Special Report with Bret Baier, Mullin raised the possibility that cities with sanctuary policies might be reevaluated for their role in processing international arrivals. He questioned whether jurisdictions that decline to assist federal immigration enforcement should continue handling customs operations tied to international flights.
His comments point to a broader argument from federal officials who contend that cooperation between local authorities and immigration agencies is essential, particularly at major transit hubs. The suggestion that access to customs processing could be affected represents a notable expansion of potential federal leverage over local governments.
Sanctuary cities generally limit their cooperation with federal immigration authorities, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement, often citing concerns about “community trust” and local policing priorities. Critics of these policies, including Mullin, argue they undermine federal law and complicate enforcement efforts.
The remarks come amid ongoing federal scrutiny of sanctuary jurisdictions. In early 2025, the Department of Justice established a specialized unit to challenge local policies that restrict cooperation with immigration enforcement. That effort followed a broader congressional push, in which Republican lawmakers launched investigations into major sanctuary cities, seeking information on how such policies affect federal operations.
Mullin emphasized that any actions taken would remain within the bounds of laws passed by Congress, but he also suggested that resource allocation decisions may increasingly hinge on whether local governments choose to partner with federal agencies. His comments reflect a growing willingness among some policymakers to tie federal support or access to cooperation on immigration enforcement.
The issue is unfolding against a backdrop of political disagreement in Washington. Some Democrats have advocated reducing or restructuring federal immigration enforcement agencies, while others have resisted funding without accompanying policy changes. These divisions have contributed to repeated stalemates.
As the debate continues, questions remain about how far the federal government can go in pressuring local jurisdictions—and whether measures like restricting customs processing authority would withstand anticipated legal and political challenges.
READ NEXT: Oklahoma Governor’s Pick To Replace Mullin Draws Scrutiny Over Past Donation
“could be affected represents a notable expansion of potential federal leverage over local governments.“
If that idiotic “local govt.” led by God hating fools who are dedicated to destroying our constitution the federal govt. has every right and responsibility to have “leverage over” them.