The Department of Justice (DOJ) has officially dropped its criminal investigation into journalist James O’Keefe and his associates, Spencer Meads and Eric Cochran, regarding the Ashley Biden diary case. The decision, announced by the Southern District of New York (SDNY) on Wednesday, marks the end of a legal saga that raised serious concerns about press freedom and government overreach.
Case Closed, Documents to Be Unsealed
According to the DOJ, the grand jury investigation that led to the prosecution of Aimee Harris and Robert Kurlander—who allegedly sold the diary to Project Veritas—has concluded, and no further criminal charges will be filed. As part of the case’s closure, the search warrant affidavit materials will be unsealed, allowing the public to scrutinize the legal justification behind the controversial raids on O’Keefe and his colleagues.
In a letter submitted to Judge Analisa Torres, Attorney Danielle R. Sassoon wrote:
“The Government respectfully submits this letter to notify the Court that the grand jury investigation … has concluded… no additional criminal charges are forthcoming.”
BREAKING NEWS: DOJ Announces It Has DROPPED Criminal Investigation Into James O'Keefe, Spencer Meads and Eric Cochran Over the Ashley Biden Diary
— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) February 5, 2025
The Southern District of New York Announcing Today the Criminal Case IS CLOSED and the Search Warrant Affidavit Materials Will Be… pic.twitter.com/GTW4Hj91kT
This development follows a fierce legal battle spearheaded by O’Keefe, with support from attorneys Brian Hauss and Brett Kaufman of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). They fought to unseal the search warrant materials tied to the DOJ’s aggressive Nov. 5, 2021, raid on O’Keefe’s home—a raid many viewed as a politically motivated attack on investigative journalism.
The government has agreed to unseal the documents with necessary redactions, revealing the basis—or lack thereof—for the controversial search warrant. Attorney Jeff Lichtman noted the rarity of such unsealings, stating he has only seen it happen “10 times in probably 30-plus years.”
With the case closed, O’Keefe now has the opportunity to pursue legal action against the DOJ, potentially arguing that the department violated his First Amendment rights by treating investigative journalism as a criminal enterprise.
For O’Keefe’s supporters, this case has underscored concerns about a two-tiered justice system and the selective prosecution of journalists based on political leanings. While legacy media outlets have long operated under robust legal protections, citizen journalists like O’Keefe have faced aggressive legal challenges that some argue are politically motivated.
With the release of the search warrant materials imminent, the public will soon see for themselves the justification—or lack thereof—behind the DOJ’s actions.
READ NEXT: Michigan Lawmaker Undergoes Medical Procedure Over Fear Of Trump Policies
Great news.
Next the Epstien Files