Thursday’s unveiling of a decades-old sexual assault allegation against Donald Trump, purported involving Jeffrey Epstein and former model Stacey Williams, has sparked more questions than answers. The allegation surfaced during a paid Zoom call hosted by the Harris campaign, raising immediate doubts about the timing and intent behind the claim. Even more curious, the story found its way into print not in the United States but in the left-leaning British newspaper, The Guardian, after multiple American media outlets reportedly passed on the story.
The new Trump allegation was made in a paid Harris campaign zoom call
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) October 23, 2024
Completely planted
Even some users who aren’t exactly Trump supporters found the release disappointing. On X, Election Wizard voiced frustration with the Harris campaign’s so-called “October surprise.” “I feel very let down by the Harris people. I was promised a ‘bombshell Trump story’ that would upend the race,” Election Wizard tweeted. “Instead, I got tabloid piece” published in a partisan British newspaper.
A Timeline That Doesn’t Add Up
Adding to the skepticism is the timeline of the alleged events, which is, at best, murky. The accusation, now over 30 years old, reportedly involves an encounter between Williams, Epstein and Trump. In a video interview, Williams recounts a walk with Epstein “from his brownstone on the Upper East Side down Fifth Avenue” in “late winter of 1993,” claiming they visited Trump on a whim.
However, this is where the details begin to unravel. According to ZeroHedge, Epstein only moved into the Wexler mansion on 9 East 71st Street in 1996—three years after this supposed impromptu visit with Trump was said to have taken place. So, how could such a meeting have happened in a location Epstein hadn’t even acquired yet?
"Late winter of 1993 I was on a walk with Jeffrey [Epstein] from his brownstone on the Upper East Side down Fifth Avenue, when Jeffrey looked at me and said "You know let's go stop by and see Trump"."
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) October 24, 2024
Strange: Epstein only moved into the Wexler mansion on 9 East 71st in 1996. https://t.co/nNWp3TeKzy
As reported by American Liberty News on Wednesday, political journalist Mark Halperin warned about “actors” attempting to influence the 2024 presidential race. Halperin mentioned that he was approached with a story supposedly capable of “ending Trump’s campaign,” but he did not find it credible and chose not to pursue it:
“The point I was making is actors who want a certain outcome are on social media and in pitches to reporters, and in the case of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg… are trying to affect the end of the race because they’re so desperate to try to pull a Comey,” Halperin stated, referencing the 2016 election’s late-stage developments. He reiterated, “I’m not pursuing the story. I don’t think it’s true… All I’m saying is there are people out there pitching stuff.” (RELATED: Slain Soldier’s Family Dismisses The Atlantic’s Trump ‘Hit Piece’)
NEW: Mark Halperin clarifies himself after he went viral for stating he had been pitched a story that would “end Trump’s campaign.”
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 23, 2024
Halperin says the comment was made to warn people of “actors” who are trying to influence the election.
Halperin added that he isn’t pursuing the… pic.twitter.com/9QZ7T7w20C
This clarification comes amid signs of stronger-than-expected early voting turnout for Republicans, though prominent conservatives are warning supporters not to become complacent.
READ NEXT: Democratic Party Operative Allegedly Caught Tampering With Ballot Drop Box In Montana
this is sort of like the old woman who sued trump with a democrat donors money, reid Hoffman. it was eerily exactly the same scenario as a LAW AND ORDER , special victims unit story involving a woman who was sexually assaulted in of all places BERGDORFS DEPT STORES LINGERIE DEPARTMENT. this story aired in the late 1990’s. the same time frame that this woman alleged. and the democratic machine made the accusation against trump, even though the womans details were at best sketchy. it was the same thing as this story. lets make an accusation and see if we can get a dem judge, jury, prosecutor to go along with it. this woman is crazy as in qualifying for instutionalization crazy. she paints the rocks and tree trunks around her rat infested cabin blue. she names the rats infesting her house. she has cat she named vagina. her other animals are named after womens privates. why did reed Hoffman bankroll this nutcase? it was a get trump that backfired. no one believed it for one moment. this woman waited over 30 years to bring it up. why? she had no money. he offered and she accepted. now she is a millionaire LIAR. HOPE SHE ROTS IN HELL FOR HER LIES.
what good is commenting when you hide them from readers? why waste our time. sl
where’s the first post> it is easily verifiable if you really want the truth posted here. check it out. I dont print things you cannot verify. it is not speculation. google the tv show. see the exact same script. word for word. reid Hoffman paid for the sham trial. google that also. people need to defend trump from democrat liars. and folks who ask for a response should verify and post it for all to read.
Lady, you may have been a model in your day but you are a failure as an actress! Good luck or HANG it up! You’re Pathetic!